From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mbizon@freebox.fr (Maxime Bizon) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 23:07:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: add dtbImage.
and dtbuImage.
rules In-Reply-To: <20130930204223.GJ31178@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <504DFBBF.5010202@free-electrons.com> <1348733441-11626-1-git-send-email-richard.genoud@gmail.com> <20120927082955.GR17667@game.jcrosoft.org> <52416F97.802@keymile.com> <20130924120152.GI11119@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20130924121939.GD12758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1380572483.31472.51.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> <20130930204223.GJ31178@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <1380575265.23932.11.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 16:42 -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > Nicolas Pitre already suggested an impedance matcher that keeps this > kind of hacky code out of the kernel, and allows users to do exactly I know that, my proposal was to bring this back into the kernel. That "kind of hacky" ATAG thing was actually the only supported way to boot a platform not so long ago :) In the end, people needing the impedance matcher will somehow integrate it in the kernel build system anyway. -- Maxime