From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dinguyen@altera.com (Dinh Nguyen)
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:31:58 -0500
Subject: socfpga-next
In-Reply-To: <20131003130240.GS9632@pengutronix.de>
References: <20131003130240.GS9632@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <1380807118.30559.3.camel@linux-builds1>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Robert,

On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 15:02 +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> Hi Dinh,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:35:29AM +0200, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> > BTW: It seems there is no official maintainer(tree) for the socfpga dt stuff.
> > So, I rebased onto next-20130927.
> 
> It would be great if you could establish some kind of socfpga-next tree,
> where we can see what you have already taken, and which could be put
> into linux-next.
> 
> What do you think?

Do you mean at kernel.org or just at any other place? I have a git repo
that I'm managing with commits that are sent out for review or have
Acks.

git://git.rocketboards.org/linux-socfpga-next.git

next-dt : DTS updates
for-next : latest from Linus + patches(being reviewed)


Dinh

> 
> rsc