From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dinguyen@altera.com (Dinh Nguyen)
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:54:14 -0500
Subject: [GIT PULL]socfpga: DTS updates for v3.13
In-Reply-To: <87y562rwli.fsf@linaro.org>
References: <1381198434-9583-1-git-send-email-dinguyen@altera.com>
 <87y562rwli.fsf@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <1381355654.13129.1.camel@linux-builds1>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Kevin,

On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 13:57 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> <dinguyen@altera.com> writes:
> 
> > Hi Kevin, Olof, and Arnd:
> >
> > Please consider these DTS updates for the Altera SOCFPGA platform for v3.13:
> >
> > Five of the six patches do NOT have an Ack from the DTS maintainers. I have
> > sent the patches out for review, but since these patches do not change
> > bindings nor add new ones, I don't think they will get too much attention.
> >
> > Please advise if you think I need to wait for Ack(s) from them.
> 
> The DT maintainers are primarily there to review new/modified bindings,
> so if there are now new/modified bindings, it's not a hard requirement
> for them to review/ack (though we still prefer it.)
> 
> In this case, it's mostly just reorganizing and cleanup of existing dts
> data, so there are no problems with us taking it.
> 
> That being said, the patch content looks fine, but as a matter of
> process, since you took accepted/queued these patches from Steffen into
> your tree before passing them on to us, you should have a Signed-off-by:
> on them instead of an Acked-by: since you're formally on the delivery
> path. (c.f. sections 12 & 13 of Documentation/SubmittingPatches for all
> the details.)

I should have known about this. Thanks for the feedback.

> 
> Could you please respin a branch with the proper signoffs, and then I'll
> queue it up for v3.13.

Will do..

Dinh
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kevin
>