From: liuj97@gmail.com (Jiang Liu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/7] arm64: introduce interfaces to hotpatch kernel and module code
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 23:19:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1382109602-27432-3-git-send-email-liuj97@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382109602-27432-1-git-send-email-liuj97@gmail.com>
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Introduce three interfaces to patch kernel and module code:
aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync():
patch code without synchronization, it's caller's responsibility
to synchronize all CPUs if needed.
aarch64_insn_patch_text_sync():
patch code and always synchronize with stop_machine()
aarch64_insn_patch_text():
patch code and synchronize with stop_machine() if needed
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h | 19 ++++++++-
arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
index 7499490..7a69491 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
@@ -71,8 +71,25 @@ enum aarch64_insn_hint_op {
bool aarch64_insn_is_nop(u32 insn);
-enum aarch64_insn_encoding_class aarch64_get_insn_class(u32 insn);
+/*
+ * In ARMv8-A, A64 instructions have a fixed length of 32 bits and are always
+ * little-endian.
+ */
+static __always_inline u32 aarch64_insn_read(void *addr)
+{
+ return le32_to_cpu(*(u32 *)addr);
+}
+static __always_inline void aarch64_insn_write(void *addr, u32 insn)
+{
+ *(u32 *)addr = cpu_to_le32(insn);
+}
+
+enum aarch64_insn_encoding_class aarch64_get_insn_class(u32 insn);
bool aarch64_insn_hotpatch_safe(u32 old_insn, u32 new_insn);
+int aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(void *addr, u32 insn);
+int aarch64_insn_patch_text_sync(void *addrs[], u32 insns[], int cnt);
+int aarch64_insn_patch_text(void *addrs[], u32 insns[], int cnt);
+
#endif /* __ASM_INSN_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
index f5b779f..3879db4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@
*/
#include <linux/compiler.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
+#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
#include <asm/insn.h>
static int aarch64_insn_encoding_class[] = {
@@ -88,3 +91,91 @@ bool __kprobes aarch64_insn_hotpatch_safe(u32 old_insn, u32 new_insn)
return __aarch64_insn_hotpatch_safe(old_insn) &&
__aarch64_insn_hotpatch_safe(new_insn);
}
+
+int __kprobes aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(void *addr, u32 insn)
+{
+ u32 *tp = addr;
+
+ /* A64 instructions must be word aligned */
+ if ((uintptr_t)tp & 0x3)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ aarch64_insn_write(tp, insn);
+ flush_icache_range((uintptr_t)tp, (uintptr_t)tp + sizeof(u32));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+struct aarch64_insn_patch {
+ void **text_addrs;
+ u32 *new_insns;
+ int insn_cnt;
+};
+
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(text_patch_lock);
+static atomic_t text_patch_id;
+
+static int __kprobes aarch64_insn_patch_text_cb(void *arg)
+{
+ int i, ret = 0;
+ struct aarch64_insn_patch *pp = arg;
+
+ if (atomic_read(&text_patch_id) == smp_processor_id()) {
+ for (i = 0; ret == 0 && i < pp->insn_cnt; i++)
+ ret = aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(pp->text_addrs[i],
+ pp->new_insns[i]);
+ /* Let other CPU continue */
+ atomic_set(&text_patch_id, -1);
+ } else {
+ while (atomic_read(&text_patch_id) != -1)
+ cpu_relax();
+ isb();
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+int __kprobes aarch64_insn_patch_text_sync(void *addrs[], u32 insns[], int cnt)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct aarch64_insn_patch patch = {
+ .text_addrs = addrs,
+ .new_insns = insns,
+ .insn_cnt = cnt,
+ };
+
+ if (cnt <= 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ mutex_lock(&text_patch_lock);
+ atomic_set(&text_patch_id, smp_processor_id());
+ ret = stop_machine(aarch64_insn_patch_text_cb, &patch, cpu_online_mask);
+ mutex_unlock(&text_patch_lock);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+int __kprobes aarch64_insn_patch_text(void *addrs[], u32 insns[], int cnt)
+{
+ int ret;
+ bool safe = false;
+
+ if (cnt == 1)
+ safe = aarch64_insn_hotpatch_safe(aarch64_insn_read(addrs[0]),
+ insns[0]);
+
+ if (safe) {
+ /*
+ * ARMv8 architecture doesn't guarantee all CPUs see the new
+ * instruction after returning from function
+ * aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(). So send a IPI to all other
+ * CPUs to achieve instruction synchronization.
+ */
+ ret = aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(addrs[0], insns[0]);
+ kick_all_cpus_sync();
+ } else {
+ ret = aarch64_insn_patch_text_sync(addrs, insns, cnt);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
--
1.8.1.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-18 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-18 15:19 [PATCH v5 0/7] Optimize jump label implementation for ARM64 Jiang Liu
2013-10-18 15:19 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] arm64: introduce basic aarch64 instruction decoding helpers Jiang Liu
2013-10-31 17:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-11-06 15:10 ` Jiang Liu
2013-10-18 15:19 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2013-10-30 0:12 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] arm64: introduce interfaces to hotpatch kernel and module code Will Deacon
2013-11-03 15:55 ` Jiang Liu
2013-11-04 15:12 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-06 10:41 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-06 16:12 ` Jiang Liu
2013-11-06 18:09 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-27 12:20 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-27 15:40 ` Jiang Liu
2013-11-28 22:39 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2013-10-18 15:19 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] arm64: move encode_insn_immediate() from module.c to insn.c Jiang Liu
2013-10-18 15:19 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] arm64: introduce aarch64_insn_gen_{nop|branch_imm}() helper functions Jiang Liu
2013-10-30 0:48 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-06 16:31 ` Jiang Liu
2013-11-06 16:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-11-06 18:02 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-18 15:19 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] arm64, jump label: detect %c support for ARM64 Jiang Liu
2013-10-30 0:49 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-06 16:32 ` Jiang Liu
2013-10-18 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] arm64, jump label: optimize jump label implementation Jiang Liu
2013-10-30 0:55 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-06 16:38 ` Jiang Liu
2013-10-18 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] jump_label: use defined macros instead of hard-coding for better readability Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1382109602-27432-3-git-send-email-liuj97@gmail.com \
--to=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).