From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tixy@linaro.org (Jon Medhurst (Tixy)) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:11:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2 08/13] ARM: use a function table for determining instruction interpreter actions In-Reply-To: <1381871068-27660-9-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org> References: <1381871068-27660-1-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org> <1381871068-27660-9-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org> Message-ID: <1384362668.3392.41.camel@linaro1.home> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 17:04 -0400, David Long wrote: > From: "David A. Long" > > When interpreting instructions use a client-supplied array of functions > to take action. This array can then be provided by krpobes, uprobes, or 'to take action' sounds a bit weird to me, how about 'to specify actions'? > possibly some other client subsystem. The interpreter assigns a group > number to each recognized instruction and invokes the corresponding action > function. > > Signed-off-by: David A. Long > --- > arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 2 +- > arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-arm.c | 41 ++ > arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-common.c | 3 +- > arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-thumb.c | 1016 ++++---------------------------------- > arch/arm/kernel/kprobes.c | 10 +- > arch/arm/kernel/kprobes.h | 14 +- > arch/arm/kernel/probes-arm.c | 114 ++--- > arch/arm/kernel/probes-arm.h | 37 ++ > arch/arm/kernel/probes-thumb.c | 875 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/kernel/probes-thumb.h | 136 +++++ > arch/arm/kernel/probes.c | 9 +- > arch/arm/kernel/probes.h | 15 +- > 12 files changed, 1288 insertions(+), 984 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/probes-thumb.c > create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/probes-thumb.h As I mentioned in comments to patch 7, this patch seems to accidentally include the thumb code reorg of moving code from kprobes-thumb.c to probes-thumb.c I've no other comments on the patch so trimmed the rest... -- Tixy