linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tixy@linaro.org (Jon Medhurst (Tixy))
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/13] kprobes: Remove uneeded kernel dependency on struct arch_specific_insn
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:13:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1384362833.3392.42.camel@linaro1.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381871068-27660-11-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org>

On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 17:04 -0400, David Long wrote:
> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@linaro.org>
> 
> Instead of depending on include/asm/kprobes.h to provide a dummy definition
> for struct arch_specific_insn, do so in include/linux/kprobes.h.

That change description doesn't quite seem to quite make sense to me.

Anyway, what we're trying to do with this patch is to allow us to use
arch_specific_insn for purposes additional to implementing kprobes. This
patch enables that but I'm wary that the kprobes code assumes that ainsn
is a struct arch_specific_insn, e.g. in linux/kernel/kprobes.c we have:

	memcpy(&p->ainsn, &ap->ainsn, sizeof(struct arch_specific_insn));

Now, that code isn't compiled when kprobes isn't configured, but it
seams to me to be safer if that was also changed to 

	memcpy(&p->ainsn, &ap->ainsn, sizeof(p->ainsn));

However, I also wonder if we should instead leave arch_specific_insn as
a kprobes specific structure and on ARM define it in terms of a new more
generic 'struct probe_insn'? The drawback with that is that we'd
probably end up with a struct just containing a single member which
seems a bit redundant:

struct arch_specific_insn {
	struct probe_insn pinsn;
};

Thought's anyone?

> 
> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/kprobes.h | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kprobes.h b/include/linux/kprobes.h
> index 925eaf2..4b5a74d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kprobes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kprobes.h
> @@ -52,9 +52,6 @@
>  
>  #else /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
>  typedef int kprobe_opcode_t;
> -struct arch_specific_insn {
> -	int dummy;
> -};
>  #endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
>  
>  struct kprobe;
> @@ -110,7 +107,11 @@ struct kprobe {
>  	kprobe_opcode_t opcode;
>  
>  	/* copy of the original instruction */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
>  	struct arch_specific_insn ainsn;
> +#else
> +	int ainsn;
> +#endif
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Indicates various status flags.

-- 
Tixy

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-13 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-15 21:04 [PATCH v2 00/13] uprobes: Add uprobes support for ARM David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] uprobes: move function declarations out of arch David Long
2013-11-05 16:01   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-05 18:16     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-05 19:01       ` [PATCH] uprobes: Export write_opcode() as uprobe_write_opcode() Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-05 19:55         ` David Long
2013-11-05 19:13       ` [PATCH v2 01/13] uprobes: move function declarations out of arch David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] uprobes: allow ignoring of probe hits David Long
2013-10-19 17:02   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-22  3:45     ` David Long
2013-10-22 11:25       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-22 23:56         ` David Long
2013-10-28 18:54     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-30 21:11       ` David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] uprobes: allow arch access to xol slot David Long
2013-10-19 16:36   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-23  0:03     ` David Long
2013-10-29 15:40       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-04 19:49         ` [PATCH] uprobes: introduce arch_uprobe->ixol Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-04 21:25           ` David Long
2013-11-05 16:04           ` David Long
2013-11-05 18:01             ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-05 18:45               ` David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] uprobes: allow arch-specific initialization David Long
2013-10-19 16:42   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-23  1:21     ` David Long
2013-10-28 18:58       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-31 18:41         ` David Long
2013-11-01 13:52           ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-04  3:24             ` David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] uprobes: add arch write opcode hook David Long
2013-10-19 16:50   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-23 18:20     ` David Long
2013-10-28 19:49       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-29 19:59         ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-02  3:33           ` David Long
2013-11-02 14:03             ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] ARM: move shared uprobe/kprobe definitions into new include file David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] ARM: Disable jprobe selftests in thumb kernels David Long
2013-11-07 17:26   ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-10 22:57     ` David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] kprobes: Remove uneeded kernel dependency on struct arch_specific_insn David Long
2013-11-13 17:13   ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy) [this message]
2013-11-14  2:02     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-14 14:15       ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-14 20:33         ` David Long
2013-11-15 10:23           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-15 15:16             ` David Long
2013-11-15 10:11         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-14  1:20   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] ARM: Finish renaming ARM kprobes APIs for sharing with uprobes David Long
2013-11-13 17:16   ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-15 15:45     ` David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] ARM: add uprobes support David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] ARM: Remove uprobes dependency on kprobes David Long
     [not found] ` <1381871068-27660-8-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org>
2013-11-13 17:09   ` [PATCH v2 07/13] ARM: move generic thumb instruction parsing code to new files for use by other features Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-14 14:13     ` David Long
     [not found] ` <1381871068-27660-9-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org>
2013-11-13 17:11   ` [PATCH v2 08/13] ARM: use a function table for determining instruction interpreter actions Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-14 15:17     ` David Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1384362833.3392.42.camel@linaro1.home \
    --to=tixy@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).