From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tixy@linaro.org (Jon Medhurst (Tixy)) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:44:17 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v4] ARM: vexpress/TC2: Implement MCPM power_down_finish() In-Reply-To: References: <20131108185613.GF2602@localhost.localdomain> <1384160080.4495.2.camel@hornet> <20131111134030.GA2391@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> <1384180911.4495.77.camel@hornet> Message-ID: <1384879457.3381.21.camel@linaro1.home> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 11:35 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Pawel Moll wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 13:40 +0000, Dave P Martin wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 08:54:40AM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 18:56 +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > > > > > Hi Pawel, did you manage to take a look at this? > > > > > > > > > > I want to have something in place here, otherwise there's a nice WARN_ON > > > > > to look forward to in 3.13 :) > > > > > > > > > > I don't think I've seen a response from you so far? > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 12:21 +0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > > > > > PS. I actually had a look at the patches after you reminded me last week > > > > > (two weeks ago? ;-) > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Pawel Moll > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > What's the best way to send this upstream? > > > > Through arm-soc, I believe. Generally Nico was pulling this stuff into > > his PM branch (except for the one case of me helping out with the SPC). > > > > Nevertheless I'm happy to queue it if you want me to. > > Please do so as I've nothing queued on my side at the moment. I notice that this isn't in linux-next, has it fallen through the cracks? Its absence produces a rather ugly warning and backtrace on TC2... -- Tixy