From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:30:06 +0100 Subject: [TRIVIAL PATCH 1/2] regulator: s5m8767: Define symbol for buck control mask In-Reply-To: References: <1386666583-3280-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Message-ID: <1386667806.4008.2.camel@AMDC1943> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 14:48 +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On 10 December 2013 14:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > static int s5m8767_reg_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev) > > { > > struct s5m8767_info *s5m8767 = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev); > > int ret, reg; > > - int mask = 0xc0, enable_ctrl; > > + int mask = S5M8767_ENCTRL_MASK, enable_ctrl; > > Couldn't we get rid of this mask variable here too? > > Otherwise the patch looks good to me. Not in this patch because it leads to warning: drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c: In function ?s5m8767_reg_disable?: drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c:259:2: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow] drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c:253:6: warning: unused variable ?mask? [-Wunused-variable] I plan to remove the sec_reg_*() helpers because they are confusing and error-prone (mixing u8 and unsigned int). After using standard regmap API this "mask" variable could be removed. Best regards, Krzysztof