From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] ARM: perf_event: Add basic support for Krait CPU PMUs
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 14:59:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389221984-10973-4-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389221984-10973-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Add basic support for the Krait CPU PMU. This allows us to use
the architected functionality of the PMU.
This is based on code originally written by Ashwin Chaugule and
Neil Leeder [1].
[1] https://www.codeaurora.org/cgit/quic/la/kernel/msm/tree/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_msm_krait.c?h=msm-3.4
Cc: Neil Leeder <nleeder@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c | 1 +
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 165 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
index 58916ffa61e5..ab69abf14efd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ static struct of_device_id cpu_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
{.compatible = "arm,arm11mpcore-pmu", .data = armv6mpcore_pmu_init},
{.compatible = "arm,arm1176-pmu", .data = armv6pmu_init},
{.compatible = "arm,arm1136-pmu", .data = armv6pmu_init},
+ {.compatible = "qcom,krait-pmu", .data = krait_pmu_init},
{},
};
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
index 039cffb053a7..ec86cf42d2ba 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
@@ -732,6 +732,138 @@ static const unsigned armv7_a7_perf_cache_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
};
/*
+ * Krait HW events mapping
+ */
+static const unsigned krait_perf_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_MAX] = {
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_CPU_CYCLES,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_INSTR_EXECUTED,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_REFERENCES] = HW_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES] = HW_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_PC_WRITE,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_PC_BRANCH_MIS_PRED,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_BUS_CYCLES] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_CLOCK_CYCLES,
+};
+
+static const unsigned krait_perf_map_no_branch[PERF_COUNT_HW_MAX] = {
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_CPU_CYCLES,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_INSTR_EXECUTED,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_REFERENCES] = HW_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES] = HW_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS] = HW_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_PC_BRANCH_MIS_PRED,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_BUS_CYCLES] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_CLOCK_CYCLES,
+};
+
+static const unsigned krait_perf_cache_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] = {
+ [C(L1D)] = {
+ /*
+ * The performance counters don't differentiate between read
+ * and write accesses/misses so this isn't strictly correct,
+ * but it's the best we can do. Writes and reads get
+ * combined.
+ */
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_L1_DCACHE_ACCESS,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_L1_DCACHE_REFILL,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_L1_DCACHE_ACCESS,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_L1_DCACHE_REFILL,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(L1I)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(LL)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(DTLB)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(ITLB)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(BPU)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_PC_BRANCH_PRED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_PC_BRANCH_MIS_PRED,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_PC_BRANCH_PRED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = ARMV7_PERFCTR_PC_BRANCH_MIS_PRED,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(NODE)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED,
+ },
+ },
+};
+
+/*
* Perf Events' indices
*/
#define ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER 0
@@ -1212,6 +1344,18 @@ static int armv7_a7_map_event(struct perf_event *event)
&armv7_a7_perf_cache_map, 0xFF);
}
+static int krait_map_event(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return armpmu_map_event(event, &krait_perf_map,
+ &krait_perf_cache_map, 0xFFFFF);
+}
+
+static int krait_map_event_no_branch(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return armpmu_map_event(event, &krait_perf_map_no_branch,
+ &krait_perf_cache_map, 0xFFFFF);
+}
+
static void armv7pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
{
cpu_pmu->handle_irq = armv7pmu_handle_irq;
@@ -1283,6 +1427,22 @@ static int armv7_a7_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
cpu_pmu->set_event_filter = armv7pmu_set_event_filter;
return 0;
}
+
+static int krait_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+{
+ u32 id = read_cpuid_id() & 0xffffff00;
+
+ armv7pmu_init(cpu_pmu);
+ cpu_pmu->name = "ARMv7 Krait";
+ /* Some early versions of Krait don't support PC write events */
+ if (id == 0x511f0400 || id == 0x510f0600)
+ cpu_pmu->map_event = krait_map_event_no_branch;
+ else
+ cpu_pmu->map_event = krait_map_event;
+ cpu_pmu->num_events = armv7_read_num_pmnc_events();
+ cpu_pmu->set_event_filter = armv7pmu_set_event_filter;
+ return 0;
+}
#else
static inline int armv7_a8_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
{
@@ -1308,4 +1468,9 @@ static inline int armv7_a7_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
{
return -ENODEV;
}
+
+static inline int krait_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+{
+ return -ENODEV;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_V7 */
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-08 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-08 22:59 [PATCH 0/7] Support Krait CPU PMUs Stephen Boyd
2014-01-08 22:59 ` [PATCH 1/7] ARM: perf_event: Silence sparse warning Stephen Boyd
2014-01-09 10:45 ` Will Deacon
2014-01-09 23:59 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-01-08 22:59 ` [PATCH 2/7] ARM: perf_event: Support percpu irqs for the CPU PMU Stephen Boyd
2014-01-09 10:49 ` Will Deacon
2014-01-09 19:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-01-10 10:58 ` Will Deacon
2014-01-10 19:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-01-13 11:52 ` Will Deacon
2014-01-14 20:57 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-01-15 10:33 ` Will Deacon
2014-01-08 22:59 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2014-01-09 11:04 ` [PATCH 3/7] ARM: perf_event: Add basic support for Krait CPU PMUs Will Deacon
2014-01-09 19:57 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-01-10 11:01 ` Will Deacon
2014-01-10 18:57 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-01-08 22:59 ` [PATCH 4/7] ARM: perf_event: Add hook for event index clearing Stephen Boyd
2014-01-08 22:59 ` [PATCH 5/7] ARM: perf_event: Fully support Krait CPU PMU events Stephen Boyd
2014-01-08 22:59 ` [PATCH 6/7] devicetree: bindings: Document Krait performance monitor units (PMU) Stephen Boyd
2014-01-09 18:14 ` Will Deacon
2014-01-09 19:57 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-01-08 22:59 ` [PATCH 7/7] ARM: dts: msm: Add krait-pmu to platforms with Krait CPUs Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1389221984-10973-4-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).