[PATCH 21/73] arm: don't use module_init in non-modular mach-vexpress/spc.c code

[paul.gortmaker@windriver.com (Paul Gortmaker)]

The spc.o is built for ARCH_VEXPRESS_SPC -- which is bool, and hence
this code is either present or absent.  It will never be modular,
so using module_init as an alias for __initcall can be somewhat
misleading.

Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from
init.h into module.h in the future.  If we don't do this, we'd
have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that
would be a worse thing.

Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one
of the priority categorized subgroups.  As __initcall gets
mapped onto device_initcall, our use of device_initcall
directly in this change means that the runtime impact is
zero -- it will remain at level 6 in initcall ordering.

Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c
index c26ef5b..9312a9b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c
@@ -581,4 +581,4 @@ static int __init ve_spc_clk_init(void)
 	platform_device_register_simple("vexpress-spc-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
 	return 0;
 }
-module_init(ve_spc_clk_init);
+device_initcall(ve_spc_clk_init);
-- 
1.8.4.1