linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCHv3] arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
@ 2014-01-30 21:05 Laura Abbott
  2014-01-31 22:50 ` Kees Cook
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Laura Abbott @ 2014-01-30 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

arm64 currently lacks support for -fstack-protector. Add
similar functionality to arm to detect stack corruption.

Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
---
I realized today that the patch I gave before was not going to work for recent
trees because of changes to CC_STACKPROTECTOR that were not in my working tree
before. This should be the patch to actually work against recent kernels.
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig                      |    1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c             |    6 +++++
 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index dd4327f..2ebf522 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ config ARM64
 	select HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
 	select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
 	select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
+	select HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
 	select HAVE_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
 	select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
 	select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fe5e287
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+/*
+ * GCC stack protector support.
+ *
+ * Stack protector works by putting predefined pattern at the start of
+ * the stack frame and verifying that it hasn't been overwritten when
+ * returning from the function.  The pattern is called stack canary
+ * and gcc expects it to be defined by a global variable called
+ * "__stack_chk_guard" on ARM.  This unfortunately means that on SMP
+ * we cannot have a different canary value per task.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __ASM_STACKPROTECTOR_H
+#define __ASM_STACKPROTECTOR_H
+
+#include <linux/random.h>
+#include <linux/version.h>
+
+extern unsigned long __stack_chk_guard;
+
+/*
+ * Initialize the stackprotector canary value.
+ *
+ * NOTE: this must only be called from functions that never return,
+ * and it must always be inlined.
+ */
+static __always_inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void)
+{
+	unsigned long canary;
+
+	/* Try to get a semi random initial value. */
+	get_random_bytes(&canary, sizeof(canary));
+	canary ^= LINUX_VERSION_CODE;
+
+	current->stack_canary = canary;
+	__stack_chk_guard = current->stack_canary;
+}
+
+#endif	/* _ASM_STACKPROTECTOR_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index 1e5a178..89c301d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -50,6 +50,12 @@
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
+#include <linux/stackprotector.h>
+unsigned long __stack_chk_guard __read_mostly;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__stack_chk_guard);
+#endif
+
 static void setup_restart(void)
 {
 	/*
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCHv3] arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
  2014-01-30 21:05 [PATCHv3] arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR Laura Abbott
@ 2014-01-31 22:50 ` Kees Cook
  2014-06-25  0:24   ` Kees Cook
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2014-01-31 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> arm64 currently lacks support for -fstack-protector. Add
> similar functionality to arm to detect stack corruption.
>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>

Thanks!

Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCHv3] arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
  2014-01-31 22:50 ` Kees Cook
@ 2014-06-25  0:24   ` Kees Cook
  2014-06-25  8:38     ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2014-06-25  0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> arm64 currently lacks support for -fstack-protector. Add
>> similar functionality to arm to detect stack corruption.
>>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

Hi again,

This patch never got applied any where. Who can take this?

Thanks!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCHv3] arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
  2014-06-25  0:24   ` Kees Cook
@ 2014-06-25  8:38     ` Will Deacon
  2014-06-25 22:44       ` Laura Abbott
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2014-06-25  8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 01:24:05AM +0100, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >> arm64 currently lacks support for -fstack-protector. Add
> >> similar functionality to arm to detect stack corruption.
> >>
> >> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> >> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> 
> Hi again,
> 
> This patch never got applied any where. Who can take this?

We can take this via the arm64 tree. Laura, is the patch still valid against
current mainline?

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCHv3] arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
  2014-06-25  8:38     ` Will Deacon
@ 2014-06-25 22:44       ` Laura Abbott
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Laura Abbott @ 2014-06-25 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On 6/25/2014 1:38 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 01:24:05AM +0100, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>>> arm64 currently lacks support for -fstack-protector. Add
>>>> similar functionality to arm to detect stack corruption.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> This patch never got applied any where. Who can take this?
> 
> We can take this via the arm64 tree. Laura, is the patch still valid against
> current mainline?
> 

Apparently not. I will send out a rebased version.

Thanks,
Laura

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-25 22:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-30 21:05 [PATCHv3] arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR Laura Abbott
2014-01-31 22:50 ` Kees Cook
2014-06-25  0:24   ` Kees Cook
2014-06-25  8:38     ` Will Deacon
2014-06-25 22:44       ` Laura Abbott

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).