From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: atomics: implement a better __atomic_add_unless for v6+
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 13:28:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1391520525-14903-2-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391520525-14903-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
Looking at perf profiles of multi-threaded hackbench runs, a significant
performance hit appears to manifest from the cmpxchg loop used to
implement the 32-bit atomic_add_unless function. This can be mitigated
by writing a direct implementation of __atomic_add_unless which doesn't
require iteration outside of the atomic operation.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h
index 6e410090896e..9a92fd7864a8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -141,6 +141,33 @@ static inline int atomic_cmpxchg(atomic_t *ptr, int old, int new)
return oldval;
}
+static inline int __atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
+{
+ int oldval, newval;
+ unsigned long tmp;
+
+ smp_mb();
+ prefetchw(&v->counter);
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__ ("@ atomic_add_unless\n"
+"1: ldrex %0, [%4]\n"
+" teq %0, %5\n"
+" beq 2f\n"
+" add %1, %0, %6\n"
+" strex %2, %1, [%4]\n"
+" teq %2, #0\n"
+" bne 1b\n"
+"2:"
+ : "=&r" (oldval), "=&r" (newval), "=&r" (tmp), "+Qo" (v->counter)
+ : "r" (&v->counter), "r" (u), "r" (a)
+ : "cc");
+
+ if (oldval != u)
+ smp_mb();
+
+ return oldval;
+}
+
#else /* ARM_ARCH_6 */
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -189,10 +216,6 @@ static inline int atomic_cmpxchg(atomic_t *v, int old, int new)
return ret;
}
-#endif /* __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ */
-
-#define atomic_xchg(v, new) (xchg(&((v)->counter), new))
-
static inline int __atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
{
int c, old;
@@ -203,6 +226,10 @@ static inline int __atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
return c;
}
+#endif /* __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ */
+
+#define atomic_xchg(v, new) (xchg(&((v)->counter), new))
+
#define atomic_inc(v) atomic_add(1, v)
#define atomic_dec(v) atomic_sub(1, v)
--
1.8.2.2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-04 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-04 13:28 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: prefetch: add prefetchw invocations for barriered atomics Will Deacon
2014-02-04 13:28 ` Will Deacon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1391520525-14903-2-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox