From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] i2c: mv64xxx: refactor send_start
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:36:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1392323793-4125-4-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392323793-4125-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de>
For start and restart, we are doing the same thing. Let's consolidate
that.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
index d52d849..9c37b59 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
@@ -419,6 +419,17 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_fsm(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data, u32 status)
}
}
+static void mv64xxx_i2c_send_start(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data)
+{
+ /* Can we offload this msg ? */
+ if (mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg(drv_data) < 0) {
+ /* No, switch to standard path */
+ mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io(drv_data, drv_data->msgs);
+ writel(drv_data->cntl_bits | MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_START,
+ drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control);
+ }
+}
+
static void
mv64xxx_i2c_do_action(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data)
{
@@ -435,14 +446,11 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_do_action(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data)
drv_data->msgs++;
drv_data->num_msgs--;
- if (mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg(drv_data) < 0) {
- drv_data->cntl_bits |= MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_START;
- writel(drv_data->cntl_bits,
- drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control);
+ // CHECKME: Does it work? Order of writel and prepare_for_io is
+ // exchanged. Also, do we need to change cntl_bits in drv_data
+ // with |= MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_START?
+ mv64xxx_i2c_send_start(drv_data);
- /* Setup for the next message */
- mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io(drv_data, drv_data->msgs);
- }
if (drv_data->errata_delay)
udelay(5);
@@ -460,13 +468,7 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_do_action(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data)
break;
case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START:
- /* Can we offload this msg ? */
- if (mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg(drv_data) < 0) {
- /* No, switch to standard path */
- mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io(drv_data, drv_data->msgs);
- writel(drv_data->cntl_bits | MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_START,
- drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control);
- }
+ mv64xxx_i2c_send_start(drv_data);
break;
case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_ADDR_1:
--
1.8.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-13 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-07 10:55 [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: Fix locked bus when offload is selected but not used on a message Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-07 15:09 ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-07 15:18 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-07 18:09 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-02-07 18:13 ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-08 17:01 ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-13 9:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-02-13 14:23 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 20:36 ` [PATCH 0/5] mv64xxx updates Wolfram Sang
2014-02-13 20:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] i2c: mv64xxx: put offload check into offload prepare function Wolfram Sang
2014-02-14 11:38 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 20:36 ` [PATCH 2/5] i2c: mv64xxx: refactor message start to ensure proper initialization Wolfram Sang
2014-02-14 11:39 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-15 14:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-02-13 20:36 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2014-02-14 11:42 ` [PATCH 3/5] i2c: mv64xxx: refactor send_start Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 20:36 ` [PATCH 4/5] i2c: mv64xxx: directly call send_start when initializing transfer Wolfram Sang
2014-02-13 20:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] i2c: mv64xxx: refactor initialization for new msgs Wolfram Sang
2014-02-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 0/5] mv64xxx updates Gregory CLEMENT
2014-03-10 16:25 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-02-13 20:51 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-18 11:29 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1392323793-4125-4-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).