From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: iivanov@mm-sol.com (Ivan T. Ivanov) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:44:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] clk: qcom: Add missing clock at index GCC_XO_CLK for MSM8974 In-Reply-To: <20140219201703.GG14769@codeaurora.org> References: <1392819521-25734-1-git-send-email-iivanov@mm-sol.com> <20140219201703.GG14769@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <1392882243.17130.75.camel@iivanov-dev> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 12:17 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 02/19, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > > From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" > > > > Accessing GCC on MSM8974 trough <&gcc GCC_XO_CLK> lead to NULL > > s/trough/through/ > > > pointer dereference. Fix this. > > > > I think you want to get the XO clock from the not yet upstreamed > RPM clock driver. This #define is for a gate that is internal to > the SoC sitting between the pin for XO and all downstream users > of the XO clock within the SoC. Futhermore, linux is not allowed > to control this gate because it's essential to the entire system. > > This patch will work for now but we'll need to change the DTS in > the future to get the clock from the RPM node and then revert > this patch. > > It may be better to just move the XO and sleep_clk_src clocks to > DT and make them fixed-rate clocks that get added by > of_clk_init(). Then when the RPM node is added we can remove the > XO node and update the usb node at the same time. I see. I'll leave you to decide what is the right solution here, Regards, Ivan