From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel)
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:28:16 +0100
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx6q: Mark VPU and IPU AXI transfers as
 cacheable, increase IPU priority
In-Reply-To: <20140221021947.GR3010@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
References: <1392896673-13627-1-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
 <1392896673-13627-2-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
 <20140221021947.GR3010@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Message-ID: <1392978496.3091.9.camel@pizza.hi.pengutronix.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Shawn,

Am Freitag, den 21.02.2014, 10:19 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:44:33PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > This is needed so that the IPU framebuffer scanout cannot be
> > starved by VPU or GPU activity.
> > Some boards like the SabreLite and SabreSD seem to set this in
> > the DCD already, but the documented register reset values do not
> > contain the necessary settings.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
> 
> I'm fine with the patches, but not sure if I should just apply them
> since you add 'RFC' tag in there.

I'm not sure whether this specific fixed QoS configuration should be
imposed on everyone. OTOH, following the principle of least surprise,
it's probably better to have this here, out in the open, than included
hidden in bootloader DCD tables (or not, depending on the board).
So if nobody objects, feel free to apply them.

regards
Philipp