From: pawel.moll@arm.com (Pawel Moll)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: integrator: multiplatform advancements
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 16:19:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1394036394.4160.12.camel@hornet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYfbgi_PY_OJpifzaS9x1fgLhGir05VS7BAw4QT5ZGMmQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 09:37 +0000, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:29:25AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> The *real* solution, one might argue is to convert the CLCD
> >> driver to DRM and add device tree bindings, but it appears that
> >> this is an orthogonal goal that has been attempted by other with
> >> mixed results.
> >
> > What mixed results? You know, I find it rather sick that people run
> > around trying to do this to a driver that I authored and maintain
> > without one comment to me about it. It sometimes feels like people
> > think I don't exist anymore.
>
> Sorry, I was referring to this driver for PL111:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=137477285809710&w=2
>
> So I take it that the PL111 is a totally different beast from
> PL110 except for the single digit difference in the name.
> Whereas PL180 and PL181 are essentially the same piece
> of hardware...
>
> Then there is this patch set for DT support for the CLCD which
> appears to be orthogonal:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=137968689722364&w=2
>
> Pawel, is this coming along?
Last week I was about to answer that this was my last word in the
subject ;-) but then I decided to give it another go, trying to address
the last - I think - controversial bit, being the pads property. Made it
much simpler and optional, so it should be in anybody's (namely the DRM
driver and bindings) way.
Will post in a second.
Pawel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-05 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-14 10:29 [PATCH 0/6] ARM: integrator: multiplatform advancements Linus Walleij
2014-02-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: integrator: localize the lm.h header Linus Walleij
2014-02-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: integrator: localize the impd1.h header Linus Walleij
2014-02-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: integrator: merge platform.h to hardware.h Linus Walleij
2014-02-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: integrator: localize the hardware.h header Linus Walleij
2014-02-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: integrator: register sched_clock directly Linus Walleij
2014-02-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 6/6] RFC: ARM: integrator: get rid of <mach/memory.h> Linus Walleij
2014-02-14 12:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-14 13:47 ` [PATCH 0/6] ARM: integrator: multiplatform advancements Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-24 9:37 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-05 16:19 ` Pawel Moll [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1394036394.4160.12.camel@hornet \
--to=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox