From: msalter@redhat.com (Mark Salter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: fix !CONFIG_COMPAT build failures
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 10:25:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1396707949-397-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> (raw)
Recent arm64 builds using CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES are failing with:
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c: In function ?perf_reg_abi?:
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c:41:2: error: implicit declaration of function ?is_compat_thread?
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c:1398:2: error: unknown type name ?compat_uptr_t?
This is due to some recent arm64 perf commits with compat support:
commit 23c7d70d55c6d9:
ARM64: perf: add support for frame pointer unwinding in compat mode
commit 2ee0d7fd36a3f8:
ARM64: perf: add support for perf registers API
Those patches make the arm64 kernel unbuildable if CONFIG_COMPAT is not
defined and CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES depends on !CONFIG_COMPAT. This patch
allows the arm64 kernel to build with and without CONFIG_COMPAT.
Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 4 ++++
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index e868c72..baf5afb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1386,6 +1386,7 @@ user_backtrace(struct frame_tail __user *tail,
return buftail.fp;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
/*
* The registers we're interested in are at the end of the variable
* length saved register structure. The fp points at the end of this
@@ -1430,6 +1431,7 @@ compat_user_backtrace(struct compat_frame_tail __user *tail,
return (struct compat_frame_tail __user *)compat_ptr(buftail.fp) - 1;
}
+#endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
void perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry *entry,
struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -1451,6 +1453,7 @@ void perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry *entry,
tail && !((unsigned long)tail & 0xf))
tail = user_backtrace(tail, entry);
} else {
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
/* AARCH32 compat mode */
struct compat_frame_tail __user *tail;
@@ -1459,6 +1462,7 @@ void perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry *entry,
while ((entry->nr < PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) &&
tail && !((unsigned long)tail & 0x3))
tail = compat_user_backtrace(tail, entry);
+#endif
}
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
index f2d6f0a..422ebd6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
#include <linux/bug.h>
+
+#include <asm/compat.h>
#include <asm/perf_regs.h>
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
--
1.8.5.3
next reply other threads:[~2014-04-05 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-05 14:25 Mark Salter [this message]
2014-04-06 22:27 ` [PATCH] arm64: fix !CONFIG_COMPAT build failures Catalin Marinas
2014-04-07 8:04 ` Jean Pihet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1396707949-397-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com \
--to=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).