From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: l.stach@pengutronix.de (Lucas Stach) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:10:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dt-binding: fix GIC example In-Reply-To: References: <1396023951-32383-1-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <1397211012.4577.5.camel@weser.hi.pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Rob, Am Donnerstag, den 10.04.2014, 10:21 -0500 schrieb Rob Herring: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Lucas Stach wrote: > > From: Tim Harvey > > > > When using interrupt-maps, the size of a map entry is #address-cells + > > Plus what? You mean ", and "? > Urgh, I obviously messed this up while editing the commit message in the last minute. It should have been something along the lines of: When using interrupt-maps, the size of a map entry is #address-cells + #interrupt-cells. address-cells should be 0 as this offset is not used in the GIC. As #address-cells = <0> is the same as not specifying the property, simply remove it. Can you edit this while applying, or should I send a new patch? > > address-cells should be 0 as this is not used. > > > > As #address-cells = <0> is the same as not specifying the > > property, simply remove it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach > > Did this get applied? I can't seem to find patch 2. > As Shawn pointed out patch 2 got applied through the imx tree as it fixes a real bug there. Regards, Lucas -- Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-5076 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |