From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 part1 01/11] ACPI / processor: Rework _PDC related stuff to make it more arch-independent
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 21:20:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1398432017-8506-2-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398432017-8506-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
_PDC related stuff in processor_core.c is little bit X86/IA64
dependent, macros of ACPI_PDC_* are _PDC bit definitions for
Intel processors, if we use these macros in processor_core.c,
we will meet compile error when ACPI is enabled on ARM64.
This patch reworks the code to make it more arch-independent,
moving Intel related _PDC bits into architecture directory,
no functional change.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86 at kernel.org
Cc: linux-ia64 at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
---
arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h | 5 +----
arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 19 +------------------
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 19 +------------------
5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
index d651102..d2b8b9d 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -152,10 +152,7 @@ extern int __initdata nid_to_pxm_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
#endif
static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void) { return true; }
-static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
-{
- buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;
-}
+extern void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf);
#define acpi_unlazy_tlb(x)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
index 0d407b3..23e9b40 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
@@ -996,3 +996,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_unregister_ioapic);
* TBD when when IA64 starts to support suspend...
*/
int acpi_suspend_lowlevel(void) { return 0; }
+
+void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
+{
+ /* Enable coordination with firmware's _TSD info */
+ buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD | ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;
+
+ if (boot_option_idle_override == IDLE_NOMWAIT) {
+ /*
+ * If mwait is disabled for CPU C-states, the C2C3_FFH access
+ * mode will be disabled in the parameter of _PDC object.
+ * Of course C1_FFH access mode will also be disabled.
+ */
+ buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH | ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH);
+ }
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
index c8c1e70..e9f71bc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -147,24 +147,7 @@ static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void)
c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR);
}
-static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
-{
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
-
- buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP;
-
- if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EST))
- buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SWSMP;
-
- if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ACPI))
- buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_T_FFH;
-
- /*
- * If mwait/monitor is unsupported, C2/C3_FFH will be disabled
- */
- if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
- buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH);
-}
+extern void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf);
#else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
index 4b28159..95127d0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
@@ -16,6 +16,33 @@
#include <asm/mwait.h>
#include <asm/special_insns.h>
+void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
+{
+ struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
+
+ /* Enable coordination with firmware's _TSD info */
+ buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD | ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP;
+
+ if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EST))
+ buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SWSMP;
+
+ if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ACPI))
+ buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_T_FFH;
+
+ /* If mwait/monitor is unsupported, C2/C3_FFH will be disabled */
+ if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
+ buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH);
+
+ if (boot_option_idle_override == IDLE_NOMWAIT) {
+ /*
+ * If mwait is disabled for CPU C-states, the C2C3_FFH access
+ * mode will be disabled in the parameter of _PDC object.
+ * Of course C1_FFH access mode will also be disabled.
+ */
+ buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH | ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Initialize bm_flags based on the CPU cache properties
* On SMP it depends on cache configuration
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
index 71e2065..5250327 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -254,9 +254,6 @@ static void acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
buf[0] = ACPI_PDC_REVISION_ID;
buf[1] = 1;
- /* Enable coordination with firmware's _TSD info */
- buf[2] = ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD;
-
/* Twiddle arch-specific bits needed for _PDC */
arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(buf);
}
@@ -281,7 +278,7 @@ static struct acpi_object_list *acpi_processor_alloc_pdc(void)
return NULL;
}
- buf = kmalloc(12, GFP_KERNEL);
+ buf = kzalloc(12, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!buf) {
printk(KERN_ERR "Memory allocation error\n");
kfree(obj);
@@ -309,20 +306,6 @@ acpi_processor_eval_pdc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_object_list *pdc_in)
{
acpi_status status = AE_OK;
- if (boot_option_idle_override == IDLE_NOMWAIT) {
- /*
- * If mwait is disabled for CPU C-states, the C2C3_FFH access
- * mode will be disabled in the parameter of _PDC object.
- * Of course C1_FFH access mode will also be disabled.
- */
- union acpi_object *obj;
- u32 *buffer = NULL;
-
- obj = pdc_in->pointer;
- buffer = (u32 *)(obj->buffer.pointer);
- buffer[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH | ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH);
-
- }
status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_PDC", pdc_in, NULL);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-25 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-25 13:20 [PATCH v3 part1 00/11] Enable ACPI on ARM64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2014-04-25 13:20 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2014-04-29 9:36 ` [PATCH v3 part1 01/11] ACPI / processor: Rework _PDC related stuff to make it more arch-independent Grant Likely
2014-05-04 8:56 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-04-25 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 part1 02/11] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce the skeleton of _PDC related for ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-04-29 9:39 ` Grant Likely
2014-05-04 8:58 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-04-25 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 part1 03/11] ARM64 : Add dummy asm/cpu.h Hanjun Guo
2014-04-29 9:40 ` Grant Likely
2014-04-29 10:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-25 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 part1 04/11] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce arm-core.c and its related head file Hanjun Guo
2014-04-25 15:51 ` Mark Rutland
2014-04-25 16:53 ` Graeme Gregory
2014-04-25 18:38 ` Mark Rutland
2014-04-26 12:09 ` Graeme Gregory
2014-04-28 14:58 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-04-28 4:54 ` Zheng, Lv
2014-04-28 9:32 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-04-29 9:45 ` Grant Likely
2014-04-25 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 part1 05/11] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce early_param for "acpi" Hanjun Guo
2014-04-29 9:51 ` Grant Likely
2014-04-25 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 part1 06/11] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce lowlevel suspend function Hanjun Guo
2014-04-28 15:22 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-04-29 8:46 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-04-25 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 part1 07/11] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce arch_fix_phys_package_id() for cpu topology Hanjun Guo
2014-04-25 14:52 ` Mark Brown
2014-04-28 3:00 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-04-28 8:50 ` Mark Brown
2014-04-25 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 part1 08/11] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce PCI functions for ACPI on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-04-28 13:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-29 8:44 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-04-29 10:01 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-05 8:35 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-05-05 13:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-25 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 part1 09/11] ARM64 / ACPI: Enable ARM64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2014-04-25 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 part1 10/11] ARM64 / ACPI: Select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI is enabled on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-04-25 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 part1 11/11] ACPI: Make EC depend on X86 || IA64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2014-04-29 9:56 ` Grant Likely
2014-05-04 9:03 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1398432017-8506-2-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).