From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37B97E95A91 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:56:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:CC:To:Subject: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=I/0F7E3np0wpbzUkk1aVlYaWzwCGeL9KQ7+DVug3teA=; b=Qgtu/LZLar1EOP 2RE+D033AOk4ths4o+1rbaNOoeTsc61MWG5ZbYaT8HuDfYl4H08w/kISGDoRn16a8bF8aD8AXaib5 hMZ56lldSwCo77FJse+3BKKGYZa4O0Pv3ZwxS5Hn68nV0KsV/ZPiKFIk2NzrQtoSxCvt9B4VwDubZ OS1eqxq8pGynBGDbXfEDxtcY7YO4+HyOHOWmUyP6tt6MInMmB5MJnkiADtURn0IXopkthOcU8CQMC Y3IKiqBUWVYUnE8epZxe9Yp2vcNASYv/AVGI/Qbn4i2YI7ZnAAEX0IYXbleQOJMK1Us59oJGx99mT pk664dcfhvIYicycX2gg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qpscG-00B70q-1x; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 15:56:20 +0000 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93] helo=mx07-00178001.pphosted.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qpscD-00B6zV-0I; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 15:56:18 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0046660.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 399D7P9l030790; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:56:03 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foss.st.com; h= message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references:from :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= selector1; bh=72yN/PJtKSRJXmtVA+yut3IcjcusVBV+3vh9OJ6jXMI=; b=0U F6OFshRICcuO2W9xvyThnUicqt2zch1ApwS7VOhnC0+fo2Fs2nvIi9c88XwJ0MMC MVd7MoC2faveq64tHhqp0uCamd0Br6OAirAngFphh6rkAyPVWzq2DKJv08JhLCNf /b6+sY8NVBg8/AQOBNu4/FyisRSpyO4TGSz1ulfB0U43Gz47llPtU08vkJ4WDcQU 82GSjJ/bEJR8MUOpOlGc1WOys9OpnQNl5/3XTwzqTNZjULVoYO/+ANEitNZyyn5p bk1HjRWc8UBig5Ie848l+czpH1eHzj6cO92Q/YYCdwQO4lU8BxhsBwbZWQ9c4ne6 SdT8CmVtj/+SJGH+samQ== Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3tkhfdx0sx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 09 Oct 2023 17:56:03 +0200 (MEST) Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id C4DB710005E; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:56:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (shfdag1node1.st.com [10.75.129.69]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id B7DED26DDAC; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:56:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.201.20.120] (10.201.20.120) by SHFDAG1NODE1.st.com (10.75.129.69) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:56:00 +0200 Message-ID: <13aa532e-5fbe-b8d4-d005-1973f589cef3@foss.st.com> Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:56:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: media: Document STM32MP25 VENC video encoder Content-Language: en-US To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Ezequiel Garcia , Philipp Zabel , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Hans Verkuil , , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , , , , CC: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz References: <20231004091552.3531659-1-hugues.fruchet@foss.st.com> <20231004091552.3531659-4-hugues.fruchet@foss.st.com> <6bc60e4a-ddf1-4125-ba27-53ab55a553d2@linaro.org> <0de2ae74-2ba1-0e8d-aa7b-77806ac8b252@foss.st.com> <1e2a4d87-5478-4655-993d-7f404d507c82@linaro.org> From: Hugues FRUCHET In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [10.201.20.120] X-ClientProxiedBy: SHFCAS1NODE1.st.com (10.75.129.72) To SHFDAG1NODE1.st.com (10.75.129.69) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.980,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-10-09_14,2023-10-09_01,2023-05-22_02 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231009_085617_421475_E0CBA620 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.23 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Krzysztof, On 10/9/23 16:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 09/10/2023 16:24, Hugues FRUCHET wrote: >> Hi Krzysztof, >> >> On 10/9/23 15:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 09/10/2023 15:49, Hugues FRUCHET wrote: >>>> Hi Krzysztof, >>>> >>>> On 10/5/23 21:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>> On 04/10/2023 11:15, Hugues Fruchet wrote: >>>>>> Add STM32MP25 VENC video encoder bindings. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I don't understand why this binding is separate from video decoder. >>>>> Merge them. >>>> VDEC and VENC are two independent IPs with their own clock, reset, >>>> interrupt & register set, they have their own access to APB/AXI bus. >>>> Moreover future chipsets may embed only VENC or VDEC. >>>> >>>> Hoping that this clarifies the reason of two different bindings. >>> >>> No, it does not. These are no reasons to have independent bindings, >>> except when having actual impact on the bindings. The bindings look >>> identical. What are the differences? >> I'm sorry but I really don't understand your point, these are two >> different IPs with very different registers in it, so why should >> I share that in a single binding ? > > Because the binding is identical. If not, maybe I missed something, so > please point me to differences in the binding. OK, currently they are identical so I will merge into a single one even if I disagree on that. I hope that in future this will not change otherwise I'll need to revisit that and make separate bindings as initially proposed... I'll so push a v2 with merged version proposal. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > BR, Hugues. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel