From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene@kernel.org (Kukjin Kim) Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:43:17 +0900 Subject: [PATCH V5] ARM: dts: Change i2s compatible string on exynos5250 In-Reply-To: References: <1376627178-28649-1-git-send-email-padma.v@samsung.com> Message-ID: <13f801ce9a43$823571b0$86a05510$@org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Padmavathi Venna > wrote: > > This patch removes quirks from i2s node and change the i2s > > compatible names. > > > > Signed-off-by: Padmavathi Venna > > --- > > > > Changes since V4: > > - Mark Brown reverted the below two patches due to below build > failure with > > exynos_defconfig. > > "ARM: dts: exynos5250: move common i2s properties to exynos5 > dtsi" > > "ARM: dts: Change i2s compatible string on exynos5250" > > > > build error: > > DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dtb > > ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or > label "pdma1" > > ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or > label "pdma1" > > ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or > label "pdma0" > > ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or > label "pdma0" > > > > But with out "ARM: dts: Change i2s compatible string on exynos5250" will > break the i2s > > driver. > > > > So posting this patch now and will take care of posting other patch > later after dependent > > patches got merged. > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 9 +++------ > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi > > index ef57277..376090f 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi > > @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ > > }; > > > > i2s0: i2s at 03830000 { > > - compatible = "samsung,i2s-v5"; > > + compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-i2s"; > > Device tree reviewers, this is something to look out for in the > future. Some samsung platforms/drivers use "samsung,-", > others "samsung,-". I don't personally care much one way or > another, but it really should be consistent. > Hmm...I think, if "samsung,-" is possible, it would be nice. I remember there are no versions in datasheet for some IPs but something have like i2s and mfc. So "samsung,-" is used for only i2s and mfc. But actually there are versions for Samsung IPs, no comments for that in datasheet. So I think, if Samsung can provide the specific version of Samsung IPs, we can use that like other platforms. I will prepare some table for that after meeting with Samsung hardware IP team so that samsung platform use one format "samsung,-". Thanks, Kukjin