From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA780C43381 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8795220883 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="WraY8ZLB" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8795220883 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=1PgCQqnsgWeGhrKI0uQ+S6pCzDHbazfyUagi9H2+t3M=; b=WraY8ZLBzq4gWg a9XWAM7C1KS1LHvGkVtC7gk8MUHhC2b1PW2EWscbZIQKKg6eatMsWMAjw5H+0aE1dworCd00ZITqE QZ0HYH8P3LMqqP7pnIgaiMy1EgbqIqWIkOTYQ6cWbVDFfhxuT0Ilng0rwzRTMFmP/5VarSys2kg1f pyBysq809mqGb8LjBqnP1R6he0W3Y55npuBo0VU0neR/t4G4tr53lAyRIpe3whzQv//ITvUHkLWj0 P/5Dnb8D8io9dfvqJ8RpnUdtVcJcyJZ1puvuV7mRenLiL59sdaZY6GyyUM41Vkd59+86+U149YQvA hbnQc2lemsOcB2ROqroQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h3f07-0003m0-MH; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:51:15 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h3f05-0003lc-C1; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:51:14 +0000 Received: from we0652.dip.tu-dresden.de ([141.76.178.140] helo=phil.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h3f01-0001B2-T7; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:51:09 +0100 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Jagan Teki Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Nanopi NEO4 initial support Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:51:09 +0100 Message-ID: <14002714.JsTqZNVDqa@phil> In-Reply-To: <20190308181202.11607-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> References: <20190308181202.11607-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190312_035113_559355_A4FE6109 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.22 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Tomeu Vizoso , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring , Akash Gajjar , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Am Freitag, 8. M=E4rz 2019, 19:12:02 CET schrieb Jagan Teki: > FriendlyElec NanoPi NEO4 is known to be a revision 4 based > NanoPi4 series of boards. > = > Most of know peripherals are shared between Nanopi M4 vs NEO4, except > - 1GB DDR3 > - USB Host ports > - Missing DSI port > - USB 2.0 Host with USB2PHY0 (no USB2PH1) > = > Add support for it, by reusing existing rk3399-nanopi4.dtsi > = > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki > Signed-off-by: Akash Gajjar applied for 5.2 Thanks Heiko _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel