From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ydroneaud@opteya.com (Yann Droneaud)
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 10:00:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in
 platform_object
In-Reply-To: <20140531120526.GL15585@mwanda>
References: <1401480167-15091-1-git-send-email-ydroneaud@opteya.com>
 <20140530201054.GF17724@mwanda>
 <1401523299.15490.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
 <20140531120526.GL15585@mwanda>
Message-ID: <1401609616.17059.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Dan,

Le samedi 31 mai 2014 ? 15:05 +0300, Dan Carpenter a ?crit :
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:01:39AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> > Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 ? 23:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter a ?crit :
> > > This changelog doesn't match the patch.
> > > 
> > 
> > Hum, let me guess .... I've failed to set the proper subject prefix
> > to add v6 suffic to PATCH: 
> > I've changed the patch title since v5 (from Emil Goode)... so it's like
> > a new one.
> > 
> > Is it really necessary to resend the patch ?
> 
> Oh.  Sorry, I didn't understand what you were trying to say...  You're
> right.
> 

Sorry about that.

If it's unclear, I should modify the commit message.

> For some reason I just looked at the patch first and then I started
> reading the changelog and got to the bit about GCC on ARM and said
> thought have been describing a different change without reading the
> rest.  This was my bad.  I should have read more carefully.
> 
> Very thourough patch description.  :)
> 

Thank you.

Regards.

-- 
Yann Droneaud
OPTEYA