From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:57:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix suspend/resume sequencies In-Reply-To: <1403618235-19353-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> References: <1403618235-19353-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> Message-ID: <1403618235-19353-6-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Due to recent consolidation of Exynos suspend and cpuidle code, some parts of suspend and resume sequences are executed two times, once from exynos_pm_syscore_ops and then from exynos_cpu_pm_notifier() and thus it breaks suspend, at least on Exynos4-based boards. This patch fixes the issue by removing exynos_pm_syscore_ops completely and making the code rely only on CPU PM notifier. Tested on Exynos4210-based Trats board. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa --- arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 20 ++++---------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c index 87c0d34..98d4926 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c @@ -364,11 +364,6 @@ early_wakeup: return; } -static struct syscore_ops exynos_pm_syscore_ops = { - .suspend = exynos_pm_suspend, - .resume = exynos_pm_resume, -}; - /* * Suspend Ops */ @@ -438,19 +433,13 @@ static int exynos_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, switch (cmd) { case CPU_PM_ENTER: - if (cpu == 0) { - exynos_pm_central_suspend(); - exynos_cpu_save_register(); - } + if (cpu == 0) + exynos_pm_suspend(); break; case CPU_PM_EXIT: - if (cpu == 0) { - if (!soc_is_exynos5250()) - scu_enable(S5P_VA_SCU); - exynos_cpu_restore_register(); - exynos_pm_central_resume(); - } + if (cpu == 0) + exynos_pm_resume(); break; } @@ -475,6 +464,5 @@ void __init exynos_pm_init(void) tmp |= ((0xFF << 8) | (0x1F << 1)); __raw_writel(tmp, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK); - register_syscore_ops(&exynos_pm_syscore_ops); suspend_set_ops(&exynos_suspend_ops); } -- 1.9.3