[PATCH resend v3 0/2] mmc: Add SDIO function devicetree subnode parsing

[PATCH resend v3 0/2] mmc: Add SDIO function devicetree subnode parsing

[Hans de Goede]

Hi All,

Here is a resend of 3 of my submission of Sascha Hauer's
"mmc: Add SDIO function devicetree subnode parsing" patch.

Can we please get some movement on these patches, either a review specifying
why this cannot go upstream, or else queuing it up for next / 3.17 ?

Changes since v1:
- Submit as a stand-alone patch-set, rather then as part of a larger oob irq
  support patchset crossing multiple subsystems
- Add a patch to document the already existing practice of using slot subnodes
- Split of the dt bindings documentation for sdio-func child nodes into its
  own patch
- Add a preparation patch, setting slot_no where relevant
- And finally the "Add SDIO function devicetree subnode parsing" patch itself
  has been modified to look for the sdio function childnodes under a slot node
  instead of directly under the host node

Changes since v2:
- Drop the slot subnodes again, and drop the 2 slot subnodes patches

Regards,

Hans 

[PATCH resend v3 1/2] dt: bindings: mmc: Add sdio function subnode documentation

[Hans de Goede]

From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>

While SDIO devices are runtime probable they sometimes need nonprobable
additional information on embedded systems, like an additional gpio
interrupt or a clock. This binding describes how to add child nodes to the
devicetree to supply this information.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
[hdegoede at redhat.com: Documented the need for #address- and #size-cells]
[hdegoede at redhat.com: Added a real world example]
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
index 3c18001..2f362c4 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
@@ -62,7 +62,31 @@ Optional SDIO properties:
 - keep-power-in-suspend: Preserves card power during a suspend/resume cycle
 - enable-sdio-wakeup: Enables wake up of host system on SDIO IRQ assertion
 
-Example:
+
+Use of Function subnodes
+------------------------
+
+On embedded systems the cards connected to a host may need additional
+properties. These can be specified in subnodes to the host controller node.
+The subnodes are identified by the standard 'reg' property.
+Which information exactly can be specified depends on the bindings for the
+SDIO function driver for the subnode, as specified by the compatible string.
+
+Required host node properties when using function subnodes:
+- #address-cells: should be one. The cell is the slot id.
+- #size-cells: should be zero.
+
+Required function subnode properties:
+- compatible: name of SDIO function following generic names recommended practice
+- reg: Must contain the SDIO function number of the function this subnode
+       describes. A value of 0 denotes the memory SD function, values from
+       1 to 7 denote the SDIO functions.
+
+
+Examples
+--------
+
+Basic example:
 
 sdhci at ab000000 {
 	compatible = "sdhci";
@@ -76,3 +100,25 @@ sdhci at ab000000 {
 	keep-power-in-suspend;
 	enable-sdio-wakeup;
 }
+
+Example with sdio function subnode:
+
+mmc3: mmc at 01c12000 {
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
+
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&mmc3_pins_a>;
+	vmmc-supply = <&reg_vmmc3>;
+	bus-width = <4>;
+	non-removable;
+	status = "okay";
+
+	brcmf: bcrmf at 1 {
+		reg = <1>;
+		compatible = "brcm,bcm43xx-fmac";
+		interrupt-parent = <&pio>;
+		interrupts = <10 8>; /* PH10 / EINT10 */
+		interrupt-names = "host-wake";
+	};
+};
-- 
2.0.0

[PATCH resend v3 2/2] mmc: Add SDIO function devicetree subnode parsing

[Hans de Goede]

From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>

This adds SDIO devicetree subnode parsing to the mmc core. While
SDIO devices are runtime probable they sometimes need nonprobable
additional information on embedded systems, like an additional gpio
interrupt or a clock. This patch makes it possible to supply this
information from the devicetree. SDIO drivers will find a pointer
to the devicenode in their devices of_node pointer.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
[hdegoede at redhat.com: Misc. cleanups]
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/bus.c      |  4 ++++
 drivers/mmc/core/core.c     | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/mmc/core/core.h     |  3 +++
 drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c | 11 +++++++++++
 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
index d2dbf02..3b2fca9 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/stat.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
 
 #include <linux/mmc/card.h>
@@ -360,6 +361,8 @@ int mmc_add_card(struct mmc_card *card)
 #endif
 	mmc_init_context_info(card->host);
 
+	card->dev.of_node = mmc_of_find_child_device(card->host, 0);
+
 	ret = device_add(&card->dev);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -388,6 +391,7 @@ void mmc_remove_card(struct mmc_card *card)
 				mmc_hostname(card->host), card->rca);
 		}
 		device_del(&card->dev);
+		of_node_put(card->dev.of_node);
 	}
 
 	put_device(&card->dev);
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
index 7dc0c85..ca2577d 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -1205,6 +1205,34 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_of_parse_voltage);
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_OF */
 
+static int mmc_of_get_func_num(struct device_node *node)
+{
+	u32 reg;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &reg);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	return reg;
+}
+
+struct device_node *mmc_of_find_child_device(struct mmc_host *host,
+		unsigned func_num)
+{
+	struct device_node *node;
+
+	if (!host->parent || !host->parent->of_node)
+		return NULL;
+
+	for_each_child_of_node(host->parent->of_node, node) {
+		if (mmc_of_get_func_num(node) == func_num)
+			return node;
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
 
 /**
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.h b/drivers/mmc/core/core.h
index 443a584..f712f6e 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.h
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.h
@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ struct mmc_bus_ops {
 void mmc_attach_bus(struct mmc_host *host, const struct mmc_bus_ops *ops);
 void mmc_detach_bus(struct mmc_host *host);
 
+struct device_node *mmc_of_find_child_device(struct mmc_host *host,
+		unsigned func_num);
+
 void mmc_init_erase(struct mmc_card *card);
 
 void mmc_set_chip_select(struct mmc_host *host, int mode);
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c
index 4fa8fef9..4032d25 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c
@@ -21,7 +21,9 @@
 #include <linux/mmc/card.h>
 #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
 #include <linux/mmc/sdio_func.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
 
+#include "core.h"
 #include "sdio_cis.h"
 #include "sdio_bus.h"
 
@@ -302,6 +304,13 @@ static void sdio_acpi_set_handle(struct sdio_func *func)
 static inline void sdio_acpi_set_handle(struct sdio_func *func) {}
 #endif
 
+static void sdio_set_of_node(struct sdio_func *func)
+{
+	struct mmc_host *host = func->card->host;
+
+	func->dev.of_node = mmc_of_find_child_device(host, func->num);
+}
+
 /*
  * Register a new SDIO function with the driver model.
  */
@@ -311,6 +320,7 @@ int sdio_add_func(struct sdio_func *func)
 
 	dev_set_name(&func->dev, "%s:%d", mmc_card_id(func->card), func->num);
 
+	sdio_set_of_node(func);
 	sdio_acpi_set_handle(func);
 	ret = device_add(&func->dev);
 	if (ret == 0) {
@@ -334,6 +344,7 @@ void sdio_remove_func(struct sdio_func *func)
 
 	acpi_dev_pm_detach(&func->dev, false);
 	device_del(&func->dev);
+	of_node_put(func->dev.of_node);
 	put_device(&func->dev);
 }
 
-- 
2.0.0

[PATCH resend v3 0/2] mmc: Add SDIO function devicetree subnode parsing

[Ulf Hansson]

On 30 June 2014 at 11:07, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Here is a resend of 3 of my submission of Sascha Hauer's
> "mmc: Add SDIO function devicetree subnode parsing" patch.
>
> Can we please get some movement on these patches, either a review specifying
> why this cannot go upstream, or else queuing it up for next / 3.17 ?
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Submit as a stand-alone patch-set, rather then as part of a larger oob irq
>   support patchset crossing multiple subsystems
> - Add a patch to document the already existing practice of using slot subnodes
> - Split of the dt bindings documentation for sdio-func child nodes into its
>   own patch
> - Add a preparation patch, setting slot_no where relevant
> - And finally the "Add SDIO function devicetree subnode parsing" patch itself
>   has been modified to look for the sdio function childnodes under a slot node
>   instead of directly under the host node
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Drop the slot subnodes again, and drop the 2 slot subnodes patches
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans

So after quite a delay (sorry about that!!), I decided to apply this
patchset for my next branch.

Only a minor trivial conflict showed up on patch2. Also I took the
liberty to change the prefix of patch 1 into only "mmc".

Kind regards
Uffe