ARM: Kirkwood: mach-kirkwood's removal

ARM: Kirkwood: mach-kirkwood's removal

[Paul Bolle]

0) Commit ba364fc752da ("ARM: Kirkwood: Remove mach-kirkwood") is
included in next-20140714. It removes quite a bit of code.

1) The code it removes includes the Kconfig entries for
    ARCH_KIRKWOOD
    MACH_OPENRD_CLIENT
    MACH_OPENRD_ULTIMATE
    MACH_T5325

There are a few references to these Kconfig symbols still left in the
tree. Are patches to remove these references queued somewhere?

2) And is a patch to remove the "arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/" pattern from
MAINTAINERS queued somewhere?

3) By the way, MACH_KIRKWOOD looks related but is not removed in that
commit. That's not an oversight, is it?


Paul Bolle

ARM: Kirkwood: mach-kirkwood's removal

[Jason Cooper]

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:55:05AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> 0) Commit ba364fc752da ("ARM: Kirkwood: Remove mach-kirkwood") is
> included in next-20140714. It removes quite a bit of code.
> 
> 1) The code it removes includes the Kconfig entries for
>     ARCH_KIRKWOOD
>     MACH_OPENRD_CLIENT
>     MACH_OPENRD_ULTIMATE
>     MACH_T5325
> 
> There are a few references to these Kconfig symbols still left in the
> tree. Are patches to remove these references queued somewhere?

Yes, those patches are to drivers and sub-systems.  They are going
through the respective trees.  You can see the whole series at:

  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1405028192-9623-1-git-send-email-andrew at lunn.ch

> 2) And is a patch to remove the "arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/" pattern from
> MAINTAINERS queued somewhere?

oops. :)

> 3) By the way, MACH_KIRKWOOD looks related but is not removed in that
> commit. That's not an oversight, is it?

Nope.  That's the DT-only support for kirkwood in mach-mvebu/.

thx,

Jason.

ARM: Kirkwood: mach-kirkwood's removal

[Paul Bolle]

On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 08:15 -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:55:05AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > 1) The code it removes includes the Kconfig entries for
> >     ARCH_KIRKWOOD
> >     MACH_OPENRD_CLIENT
> >     MACH_OPENRD_ULTIMATE
> >     MACH_T5325
> > 
> > There are a few references to these Kconfig symbols still left in the
> > tree. Are patches to remove these references queued somewhere?
> 
> Yes, those patches are to drivers and sub-systems.  They are going
> through the respective trees.  You can see the whole series at:
> 
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1405028192-9623-1-git-send-email-andrew at lunn.ch

References to ARCH_KIRKWOOD can still be seen in v3.17-rc3 and
next-20140903. But Andrew recently sent out another batch of patches to
remove these too:
http://marc.info/?i=1409417172-6846-1-git-send-email-andrew at lunn.ch

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

ARM: Kirkwood: mach-kirkwood's removal

[Jason Cooper]

On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:07:56AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 08:15 -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:55:05AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > 1) The code it removes includes the Kconfig entries for
> > >     ARCH_KIRKWOOD
> > >     MACH_OPENRD_CLIENT
> > >     MACH_OPENRD_ULTIMATE
> > >     MACH_T5325
> > > 
> > > There are a few references to these Kconfig symbols still left in the
> > > tree. Are patches to remove these references queued somewhere?
> > 
> > Yes, those patches are to drivers and sub-systems.  They are going
> > through the respective trees.  You can see the whole series at:
> > 
> >   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1405028192-9623-1-git-send-email-andrew at lunn.ch
> 
> References to ARCH_KIRKWOOD can still be seen in v3.17-rc3 and
> next-20140903. But Andrew recently sent out another batch of patches to
> remove these too:
> http://marc.info/?i=1409417172-6846-1-git-send-email-andrew at lunn.ch

Yep, that's because I asked him to. ;-)  Unfortunately, I haven't had
time to apply them to a branch yet.  Shortly though.

thx,

Jason.