[PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

Paul Bolle
2014-07-16T10:15:56Z

On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 19:48 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> After refactoring suspend/resume, which was last part with dependencies
> on legacy code, all Kconfig symbols related to Samsung ATAGS support can
> be deselected and more unused code removed. This includes most of s5p-*
> code as well, as s5pv210 was their last user.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> ---

I noticed another thing now this patch showed up in next-20140716.

> [...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
> index f8185b5..1091b0a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
> @@ -6,29 +6,16 @@
>
> config PLAT_SAMSUNG
> bool
> - depends on PLAT_S3C24XX || ARCH_S3C64XX || PLAT_S5P || ARCH_EXYNOS
> + depends on PLAT_S3C24XX || ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_EXYNOS || ARCH_S5PV210
> default y
> select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> select NO_IOPORT_MAP
> help
> Base platform code for all Samsung SoC based systems
>
> -config PLAT_S5P
> - bool
> - depends on ARCH_S5PV210
> - default y
> - select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> - select ARM_VIC
> - select NO_IOPORT_MAP
> - select PLAT_SAMSUNG
> - select S3C_GPIO_TRACK
> - select S5P_GPIO_DRVSTR
> - help
> - Base platform code for Samsung's S5P series SoC.
> -

After this patch that symbol is still referenced in:
drivers/media/platform/Kconfig:159: depends on VIDEO_DEV && VIDEO_V4L2 && (PLAT_S5P || ARCH_EXYNOS)
drivers/media/platform/Kconfig:169: depends on VIDEO_DEV && VIDEO_V4L2 && (PLAT_S5P || ARCH_EXYNOS)
drivers/media/platform/Kconfig:177: depends on VIDEO_DEV && VIDEO_V4L2 && (PLAT_S5P || ARCH_EXYNOS)
drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/Kconfig:5: depends on (PLAT_S5P || ARCH_EXYNOS)
drivers/media/platform/s5p-tv/Kconfig:11: depends on (PLAT_S5P || ARCH_EXYNOS) && PM_RUNTIME
drivers/usb/host/Kconfig:223: depends on PLAT_S5P || ARCH_EXYNOS
drivers/usb/host/Kconfig:530: depends on PLAT_S5P || ARCH_EXYNOS

Again, I assume patches to remove these references are pending. But is
that correct?

Paul Bolle