From: skannan@codeaurora.org (Saravana Kannan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] cpufreq: Properly handle physical CPU hot-add/hot-remove
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 18:07:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1406250448-470-5-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406250448-470-1-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org>
When CPUs are physically added/removed, its cpuX sysfs directory is
dynamically added/removed. To handle this correctly, the cpufreq sysfs
nodes also need to be added/removed dynamically.
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index d9fc6e5..97edf05 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpufreq_policy *, cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback);
static DEFINE_RWLOCK(cpufreq_driver_lock);
DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_governor_lock);
static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_policy_list);
+static cpumask_t has_symlink;
/* This one keeps track of the previously set governor of a removed CPU */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN], cpufreq_cpu_governor);
@@ -865,7 +866,10 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev_symlink(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
unsigned int j;
int ret = 0;
- for_each_cpu(j, policy->related_cpus) {
+ /* Only some of the related CPUs might be present. So, create
+ * symlinks only for those.
+ */
+ for_each_cpu_and(j, policy->related_cpus, cpu_present_mask) {
struct device *cpu_dev;
if (j == policy->kobj_cpu)
@@ -877,6 +881,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev_symlink(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
"cpufreq");
if (ret)
break;
+ cpumask_set_cpu(j, &has_symlink);
}
return ret;
}
@@ -1101,9 +1106,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
unsigned long flags;
bool recover_policy = cpufreq_suspended;
- if (cpu_is_offline(cpu))
- return 0;
-
pr_debug("adding CPU %u\n", cpu);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -1111,7 +1113,19 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
* CPU because it is in the same boat. */
policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
if (policy) {
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus))
+ /* If a CPU gets physically plugged in after one or more of
+ * its related CPUs are ONLINE, we need to create a symlink
+ * for it since it wouldn't have been created when the policy
+ * was initialized. Do this as soon as it's plugged in.
+ */
+ if (sif && !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &has_symlink)) {
+ ret = sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj, &policy->kobj,
+ "cpufreq");
+ if (!ret)
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &has_symlink);
+ }
+
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) && cpu_online(cpu))
ret = cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(policy, cpu, dev);
else
ret = 0;
@@ -1120,6 +1134,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
}
#endif
+ if (cpu_is_offline(cpu))
+ return 0;
+
if (!down_read_trylock(&cpufreq_rwsem))
return 0;
@@ -1303,25 +1320,24 @@ static int cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int old_cpu)
{
struct device *cpu_dev;
+ unsigned int new_cpu;
int ret;
/* first sibling now owns the new sysfs dir */
- cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpumask_any_but(policy->cpus, old_cpu));
+ for_each_cpu_and(new_cpu, policy->related_cpus, cpu_present_mask)
+ if (new_cpu != old_cpu)
+ break;
+ cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(new_cpu);
sysfs_remove_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
ret = kobject_move(&policy->kobj, &cpu_dev->kobj);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: Failed to move kobj: %d\n", __func__, ret);
-
- down_write(&policy->rwsem);
- cpumask_set_cpu(old_cpu, policy->cpus);
- up_write(&policy->rwsem);
-
ret = sysfs_create_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, &policy->kobj,
"cpufreq");
-
return -EINVAL;
}
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(new_cpu, &has_symlink);
policy->kobj_cpu = cpu_dev->id;
return cpu_dev->id;
@@ -1407,8 +1423,12 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
cpus = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
up_read(&policy->rwsem);
- if (cpu != policy->kobj_cpu)
+ if (cpu != policy->kobj_cpu) {
sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &has_symlink);
+ } else {
+ cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(policy, cpu);
+ }
/* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */
if (cpus == 0) {
--
1.8.2.1
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-25 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-10 2:37 [PATCH] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend Saravana Kannan
2014-07-11 4:18 ` [PATCH v2] " Saravana Kannan
2014-07-11 6:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-11 9:59 ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-11 10:07 ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-11 10:52 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-12 2:44 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-14 6:09 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-14 19:08 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15 4:35 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-15 5:36 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15 5:52 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-15 6:58 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-15 17:35 ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-16 7:44 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16 5:44 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 7:49 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-12 3:06 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-14 6:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-14 19:10 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-11 7:43 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-11 10:02 ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-15 22:47 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Simplify hotplug/suspend handling Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15 22:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 0:28 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 8:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 19:19 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 8:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 11:16 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16 13:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 18:04 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16 19:56 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-17 5:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 19:56 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-17 5:35 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-18 3:25 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-18 4:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 20:25 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 21:45 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-17 6:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 14:29 ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-07-16 15:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 19:42 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15 22:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: Simplify and fix mutual exclusion with hotplug Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 8:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 19:34 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25 1:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Simplify hotplug/suspend handling Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25 1:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] cpufreq: Don't wait for CPU to going offline to restart governor Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 20:47 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25 1:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] cpufreq: Keep track of which CPU owns the kobj/sysfs nodes separately Saravana Kannan
2014-08-07 9:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-25 1:07 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-31 22:15 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 23:48 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-07 10:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-12 9:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 10:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-11 22:13 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-12 8:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-25 1:07 ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2014-08-07 11:02 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] cpufreq: Properly handle physical CPU hot-add/hot-remove Viresh Kumar
2014-08-11 22:15 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25 1:07 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] cpufreq: Delete dead code related to policy save/restore Saravana Kannan
2014-08-07 11:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-29 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Simplify hotplug/suspend handling skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-30 0:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-31 20:25 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-07 6:04 ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-10-16 8:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-10-23 21:41 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 22:02 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-16 22:35 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-24 3:02 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-24 5:04 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-24 9:12 ` skannan at codeaurora.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1406250448-470-5-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org \
--to=skannan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).