From: tixy@linaro.org (Jon Medhurst (Tixy))
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] kprobes: arm: enable OPTPROBES for arm 32
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 15:23:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1407335003.3006.38.camel@linaro1.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407223697-74911-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 15:28 +0800, Wang Nan wrote:
> This patch introduce kprobeopt for ARM 32.
>
> Limitations:
> - Currently only kernel compiled with ARM ISA is supported.
>
> - offset between probe point and kprobe pre_handler must not larger
> than 64MiB. Masami Hiramatsu suggests replacing 2 words, it will
> make things complex. Futher patch can make such optimization.
>
> I have tested this patch on qemu vexpress a9 platform.
>
> Kprobe opt on ARM is relatively simpler than kprobe opt on x86 because
> ARM instruction is always 4 bytes aligned. This patch replace probed
> instruction by a 'b', branch to trampoline code and then calls
> optimized_callback(). optimized_callback() calls kprobe_handler() to
> execute kprobe handler. It also emulate/simulate replaced instruction.
>
> When unregistering kprobe, the deferred manner of unoptimizer may leave
> branch instruction before optimizer is called. Different from x86_64,
> which only copy the probed insn after optprobe_template_end and
> reexecute them, this patch call singlestep to emulate/simulate the insn
> directly. Futher patch can optimize this behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
I've not reviewed this patch properly as I don't have time at the moment
to study the details of how optprobes work, but I did give it quick look
over to check that it was using the helper functions like patch_text()
which it does :-). I also spotted one duplication of an existing
function, see inline comment below...
[...]
> +static inline int
> +arm_branch_to_addr(unsigned int *pinst, void *src, void *dest)
> +{
> + unsigned int inst = 0xea000000;
> + long offset = (unsigned long)(dest) -
> + ((unsigned long)(src) + 8);
> + if ((offset > 0x3fffffc) || (offset < -0x3fffffc)) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Failed to instrument %pS to %pS\n", src, dest);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + inst |= (((unsigned long)offset) >> 2) & (0x00ffffffUL);
> + *pinst = inst;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
This looks remarkably similar to the code in arch/arm/kernel/insn.c so I
think you can probably just use the existing arm_gen_branch() function.
[...]
--
Tixy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-06 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-05 7:28 [RFC PATCH] kprobes: arm: enable OPTPROBES for arm 32 Wang Nan
2014-08-06 4:44 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-06 6:24 ` Wang Nan
2014-08-07 6:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-08 1:25 ` Wang Nan
2014-08-08 2:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-06 13:36 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2014-08-06 13:40 ` Wang Nan
2014-08-06 14:23 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy) [this message]
2014-08-06 22:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-08-06 22:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1407335003.3006.38.camel@linaro1.home \
--to=tixy@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).