* arm64 audit build failures in -next [not found] ` <20140823155043.GM24407@sirena.org.uk> @ 2014-08-24 20:35 ` Eric Paris 2014-08-24 20:51 ` Richard Guy Briggs 1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Eric Paris @ 2014-08-24 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel I just pushed a clean copy of Linus' tree to my audit tree. So my API change is gone when he next pull for -next. I'm on vacation this week and really wanted to get it fixed right before I left. It didn't happen. when I push a new tree into next I will pick up the arm audit patch and fix the api in my tree. -Eric On Sat, 2014-08-23 at 10:50 -0500, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 04:11:20PM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote: > > > arm64-allmodconfig > > ../arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c:1120:3: error: too many arguments to function 'audit_syscall_entry' > > This has now been broken in -next for about a month with a fix available > and since the merge window the arm64 audit support is in mainline so the > fix can be directly applied without cross tree issues (the audit changes > didn't get sent during the merge window). Catalin and Will have also > indicated that they want to remove the workaround that's in -next > currently to allow defconfig to build which would make the situation > even more pressing. > > Do we have any idea when it will be possible to get a fix into -next? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* arm64 audit build failures in -next [not found] ` <20140823155043.GM24407@sirena.org.uk> 2014-08-24 20:35 ` arm64 audit build failures in -next Eric Paris @ 2014-08-24 20:51 ` Richard Guy Briggs 1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Richard Guy Briggs @ 2014-08-24 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 14/08/23, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 04:11:20PM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote: > > arm64-allmodconfig > > ../arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c:1120:3: error: too many arguments to function 'audit_syscall_entry' > > This has now been broken in -next for about a month with a fix available > and since the merge window the arm64 audit support is in mainline so the > fix can be directly applied without cross tree issues (the audit changes > didn't get sent during the merge window). Catalin and Will have also > indicated that they want to remove the workaround that's in -next > currently to allow defconfig to build which would make the situation > even more pressing. > > Do we have any idea when it will be possible to get a fix into -next? It will be able to get into -next after eparis has reset his tree to reference v3.16 targetting v3.18-rc1. That should be in just over a week's time. - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@redhat.com> Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-08-24 20:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <E1XLCyO-0007E5-P1@cassiel.sirena.org.uk>
[not found] ` <20140823155043.GM24407@sirena.org.uk>
2014-08-24 20:35 ` arm64 audit build failures in -next Eric Paris
2014-08-24 20:51 ` Richard Guy Briggs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox