From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:13:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 03/11] KVM: ARM/arm64: avoid returning negative error code as bool In-Reply-To: <1409062410-25891-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> References: <1409062410-25891-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> Message-ID: <1409062410-25891-4-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org is_valid_cache returns true if the specified cache is valid. Unfortunately, if the parameter passed it out of range, we return -ENOENT, which ends up as true leading to potential hilarity. This patch returns false on the failure path instead. Cc: Christoffer Dall Cc: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c | 2 +- arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c index 37a0fe1bb9bb..7928dbdf2102 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c @@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ static bool is_valid_cache(u32 val) u32 level, ctype; if (val >= CSSELR_MAX) - return -ENOENT; + return false; /* Bottom bit is Instruction or Data bit. Next 3 bits are level. */ level = (val >> 1); diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c index 5805e7c4a4dd..4cc3b719208e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c @@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ static bool is_valid_cache(u32 val) u32 level, ctype; if (val >= CSSELR_MAX) - return -ENOENT; + return false; /* Bottom bit is Instruction or Data bit. Next 3 bits are level. */ level = (val >> 1); -- 2.1.0.rc1