[PATCH 0/3] clk: zynq: Clean up

[PATCH 0/3] clk: zynq: Clean up

[Soren Brinkmann]

Hi,

triggered by that discussion whether checkpatch should be used to check
files, I ran checkpatch on Zynq's clock code. A few of the reported
issues I found worth fixing.

	Thanks,
	S?ren

Soren Brinkmann (3):
  clk: zynq: Remove unnecessary OOM message
  clk: zynq: Remove pointless return at end of void function
  clk: zynq: Move const initdata into correct code section

 drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c | 30 ++++++++++++++----------------
 drivers/clk/zynq/pll.c  |  4 +---
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.0.1.g27b9230

[PATCH 1/3] clk: zynq: Remove unnecessary OOM message

[Soren Brinkmann]

As checkpatch suggests:
  WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message,
remove an error message after failing kmalloc() from the PLL driver.

Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
---
 drivers/clk/zynq/pll.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/zynq/pll.c b/drivers/clk/zynq/pll.c
index cec97596fe65..00d72fb5c036 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/zynq/pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/zynq/pll.c
@@ -211,10 +211,8 @@ struct clk *clk_register_zynq_pll(const char *name, const char *parent,
 	};
 
 	pll = kmalloc(sizeof(*pll), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!pll) {
-		pr_err("%s: Could not allocate Zynq PLL clk.\n", __func__);
+	if (!pll)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-	}
 
 	/* Populate the struct */
 	pll->hw.init = &initd;
-- 
2.1.0.1.g27b9230

[PATCH 2/3] clk: zynq: Remove pointless return at end of void function

[Soren Brinkmann]

Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
---
 drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c b/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
index 246cf1226eaa..6ab793ac8c2c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
@@ -619,5 +619,4 @@ void __init zynq_clock_init(void)
 np_err:
 	of_node_put(np);
 	BUG();
-	return;
 }
-- 
2.1.0.1.g27b9230

[PATCH 3/3] clk: zynq: Move const initdata into correct code section

[Soren Brinkmann]

Use __initconst instead of __initdata for constant init data.

Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
---
 drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c b/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
index 6ab793ac8c2c..9037bebd69f7 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
@@ -85,24 +85,22 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(canmioclk_lock);
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dbgclk_lock);
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(aperclk_lock);
 
-static const char dummy_nm[] __initconst = "dummy_name";
-
-static const char *armpll_parents[] __initdata = {"armpll_int", "ps_clk"};
-static const char *ddrpll_parents[] __initdata = {"ddrpll_int", "ps_clk"};
-static const char *iopll_parents[] __initdata = {"iopll_int", "ps_clk"};
-static const char *gem0_mux_parents[] __initdata = {"gem0_div1", dummy_nm};
-static const char *gem1_mux_parents[] __initdata = {"gem1_div1", dummy_nm};
-static const char *can0_mio_mux2_parents[] __initdata = {"can0_gate",
+static const char *armpll_parents[] __initconst = {"armpll_int", "ps_clk"};
+static const char *ddrpll_parents[] __initconst = {"ddrpll_int", "ps_clk"};
+static const char *iopll_parents[] __initconst = {"iopll_int", "ps_clk"};
+static const char *gem0_mux_parents[] __initconst = {"gem0_div1", "dummy_name"};
+static const char *gem1_mux_parents[] __initconst = {"gem1_div1", "dummy_name"};
+static const char *can0_mio_mux2_parents[] __initconst = {"can0_gate",
 	"can0_mio_mux"};
-static const char *can1_mio_mux2_parents[] __initdata = {"can1_gate",
+static const char *can1_mio_mux2_parents[] __initconst = {"can1_gate",
 	"can1_mio_mux"};
-static const char *dbg_emio_mux_parents[] __initdata = {"dbg_div",
-	dummy_nm};
+static const char *dbg_emio_mux_parents[] __initconst = {"dbg_div",
+	"dummy_name"};
 
-static const char *dbgtrc_emio_input_names[] __initdata = {"trace_emio_clk"};
-static const char *gem0_emio_input_names[] __initdata = {"gem0_emio_clk"};
-static const char *gem1_emio_input_names[] __initdata = {"gem1_emio_clk"};
-static const char *swdt_ext_clk_input_names[] __initdata = {"swdt_ext_clk"};
+static const char *dbgtrc_emio_input_names[] __initconst = {"trace_emio_clk"};
+static const char *gem0_emio_input_names[] __initconst = {"gem0_emio_clk"};
+static const char *gem1_emio_input_names[] __initconst = {"gem1_emio_clk"};
+static const char *swdt_ext_clk_input_names[] __initconst = {"swdt_ext_clk"};
 
 static void __init zynq_clk_register_fclk(enum zynq_clk fclk,
 		const char *clk_name, void __iomem *fclk_ctrl_reg,
@@ -230,6 +228,7 @@ static void __init zynq_clk_setup(struct device_node *np)
 	const char *periph_parents[4];
 	const char *swdt_ext_clk_mux_parents[2];
 	const char *can_mio_mux_parents[NUM_MIO_PINS];
+	const char *dummy_nm = "dummy_name";
 
 	pr_info("Zynq clock init\n");
 
-- 
2.1.0.1.g27b9230

[PATCH 0/3] clk: zynq: Clean up

[Mike Turquette]

Quoting Soren Brinkmann (2014-09-02 16:02:06)
> Hi,
> 
> triggered by that discussion whether checkpatch should be used to check
> files, I ran checkpatch on Zynq's clock code. A few of the reported
> issues I found worth fixing.

Applied to clk-next.

Regards,
Mike

> 
>         Thanks,
>         S?ren
> 
> Soren Brinkmann (3):
>   clk: zynq: Remove unnecessary OOM message
>   clk: zynq: Remove pointless return at end of void function
>   clk: zynq: Move const initdata into correct code section
> 
>  drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c | 30 ++++++++++++++----------------
>  drivers/clk/zynq/pll.c  |  4 +---
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.1.0.1.g27b9230
>