From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: geoff@infradead.org (Geoff Levand) Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 11:30:46 -0700 Subject: [PATCH V3 0/6] ARM64: Add support for FSL's LS2085A SoC In-Reply-To: <20140903155654.GK3127@leverpostej> References: <1409757194-28155-1-git-send-email-bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com> <11626142.L1WDF72bmp@wuerfel> <9081864.6l1AHRQ5bg@wuerfel> <20140903155654.GK3127@leverpostej> Message-ID: <1409769046.21254.158.camel@smoke> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Mark. On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 16:56 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Personally I'd like to see such things patched by the firmware/loader > where possible (ideally with some way of switching said patching off if > we really know better). I think this makes sense for the enable method at least, since the enable method is a service the firmware provides, and what the firmware provides may vary over firmware revisions or even a single revision configured differently. -Geoff