From: pawel.moll@arm.com (Pawel Moll)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: vexpress: Remove non-DT code
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:59:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1410965992.30394.6.camel@hornet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140916233020.GC30918@lee--X1>
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 00:30 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Pawel Moll wrote:
>
> > Now, with the CLCD DT support available, there is no
> > more reason to keep the non-DT support for V2P-CA9.
> >
> > Removed, together with "some" supporting code. It was
> > necessary to make PLAT_VERSATILE_SCHED_CLOCK optional
> > and selected by the machines still interested in it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 +
> > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/Kconfig | 3 -
> > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/Makefile | 3 +-
> > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/core.h | 7 -
> > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/ct-ca9x4.c | 212 ------------
> > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/include/mach/ct-ca9x4.h | 47 ---
> > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/include/mach/hardware.h | 1 -
> > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/include/mach/irqs.h | 6 -
> > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/include/mach/motherboard.h | 88 -----
> > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/platsmp.c | 42 ---
> > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c | 374 ----------------------
> > arch/arm/plat-versatile/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > drivers/clk/versatile/Makefile | 1 -
> > drivers/clk/versatile/clk-vexpress-osc.c | 7 -
> > drivers/clk/versatile/clk-vexpress.c | 86 -----
> > drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c | 71 +---
> > drivers/misc/vexpress-syscfg.c | 60 +---
> > drivers/power/reset/vexpress-poweroff.c | 17 +-
> > include/linux/vexpress.h | 19 --
> > 19 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1013 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-vexpress/ct-ca9x4.c
> > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-vexpress/include/mach/ct-ca9x4.h
> > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-vexpress/include/mach/hardware.h
> > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-vexpress/include/mach/irqs.h
> > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-vexpress/include/mach/motherboard.h
> > delete mode 100644 drivers/clk/versatile/clk-vexpress.c
>
> Is it really necessary to take the one-big-patch approach? I'm sure
> you can find a nicer way than to burden all these maintainers.
> Naturally I can't speak for everyone concerned, but I don't really
> want to be carrying all this if I don't have to. Granted I'm not
> carrying any patches touching drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c at the
> moment, but equally I don't want to rule that out.
I feel that getting all this stuff done (notice: no new features, just
removing existing stuff) was the simplest approach, without having to
rely on patches being merged in particular order.
Besides, there are three things there that are not directly maintained
by the arm-soc folk: clk (already acked by Mike), mfd (you) and
power/reset. So I thought that gathering acks for those and getting it
merged via arm-soc would be the simplest approach...
Pawel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-17 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-10 14:33 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: vexpress: Add CLCD Device Tree properties Pawel Moll
2014-09-10 14:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: vexpress: Remove non-DT code Pawel Moll
2014-09-10 14:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-10 15:40 ` Pawel Moll
2014-09-17 15:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-17 16:11 ` Pawel Moll
2014-09-18 1:04 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-09-18 7:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-18 9:19 ` Pawel Moll
2014-09-18 17:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-09-10 17:45 ` Mike Turquette
2014-09-16 23:30 ` Lee Jones
2014-09-17 14:59 ` Pawel Moll [this message]
2014-09-17 15:42 ` Lee Jones
2014-09-17 15:46 ` Pawel Moll
2014-09-17 16:54 ` Lee Jones
2014-09-17 16:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Pawel Moll
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1410965992.30394.6.camel@hornet \
--to=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).