From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pebolle@tiscali.nl (Paul Bolle) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:47:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCHv3 2/7] ARM: at91: introduce basic SAMA5D4 support In-Reply-To: <1410797759-18675-3-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> References: <1410797759-18675-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <1410797759-18675-3-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <1411732023.7866.15.camel@x220> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 18:15 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > From: Nicolas Ferre > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre This landed in next-20140926, as commit 2dc850b62e5b ("ARM: at91: introduce basic SAMA5D4 support"). > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug > index b11ad54f8d17..7b44db208f10 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug > @@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ choice > bool "Kernel low-level debugging on 9263 and 9g45" > depends on HAVE_AT91_DBGU1 > > + config AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU2 > + bool "Kernel low-level debugging on sama5d4" > + depends on HAVE_AT91_DBGU2 > + Why is this Kconfig symbol needed? Nothing in next-20140926 uses it. Are future users perhaps queued somewhere (say, in commits that didn't survive today's rather lively linux-next merges)? > config DEBUG_BCM2835 > bool "Kernel low-level debugging on BCM2835 PL011 UART" > depends on ARCH_BCM2835 Paul Bolle