From: Ian.Campbell@citrix.com (Ian Campbell)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] xen/arm: introduce GNTTABOP_cache_flush
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 17:34:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1412354047.12695.38.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410031717420.17038@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 17:20 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2014, David Vrabel wrote:
> > On 03/10/14 15:53, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Introduce support for new hypercall GNTTABOP_cache_flush.
> > > Use it to perform cache flashing on pages used for dma when necessary.
> > [..]
> > > /* functions called by SWIOTLB */
> > > @@ -22,16 +25,31 @@ static void dma_cache_maint(dma_addr_t handle, unsigned long offset,
> > > size_t len = left;
> > > void *vaddr;
> > >
> > > + if (len + offset > PAGE_SIZE)
> > > + len = PAGE_SIZE - offset;
> > > +
> > > if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> > > {
> > > - /* TODO: cache flush */
> > > + struct gnttab_cache_flush cflush;
> > > +
> > > + cflush.op = 0;
> > > + cflush.a.dev_bus_addr = pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > + cflush.offset = offset;
> > > + cflush.size = len;
> > > +
> > > + if (op == dmac_unmap_area && dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE)
> > > + cflush.op = GNTTAB_CACHE_INVAL;
> > > + if (op == dmac_map_area) {
> > > + cflush.op = GNTTAB_CACHE_CLEAN;
> > > + if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
> > > + cflush.op |= GNTTAB_CACHE_INVAL;
> > > + }
> >
> > Are all these cache operations needed? You do a clean on map regardless
> > of the direction and INVAL on map seems unnecessary.
Isn't the inval on map so that the processor doesn't decide to
evict/clean the cache line all over your newly DMA'd data?
> > I would have thought it would be:
> >
> > map && (TO_DEVICE || BOTH)
> > op = CLEAN
> >
> > unmap && (FROM_DEVICE || BOTH)
> > op = INVAL
>
> I was trying to do the same thing Linux is already doing on native to
> stay on the safe side.
>
> See arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S:v7_dma_map_area and
> arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S:v7_dma_unmap_area.
>
> Unless I misread the assembly they should match.
I think you have, beq doesn't set lr, so the called function will return
to its "grandparent". i.e. the caller of v7_dma_map_area in this case
(which will have used bl), so:
ENTRY(v7_dma_map_area)
add r1, r1, r0
teq r2, #DMA_FROM_DEVICE
beq v7_dma_inv_range
b v7_dma_clean_range
ENDPROC(v7_dma_map_area)
Is actually
if (dir == from device)
inv
else
clean
which makes much more sense I think.
>
>
> > > --- a/include/xen/interface/grant_table.h
> > > +++ b/include/xen/interface/grant_table.h
> > > @@ -479,6 +479,24 @@ struct gnttab_get_version {
> > > DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE_STRUCT(gnttab_get_version);
> > >
> > > /*
> > > + * Issue one or more cache maintenance operations on a portion of a
> > > + * page granted to the calling domain by a foreign domain.
> > > + */
> > > +#define GNTTABOP_cache_flush 12
> > > +struct gnttab_cache_flush {
> > > + union {
> > > + uint64_t dev_bus_addr;
> > > + grant_ref_t ref;
> > > + } a;
> > > + uint32_t offset; /* offset from start of grant */
> > > + uint32_t size; /* size within the grant */
> > > +#define GNTTAB_CACHE_CLEAN (1<<0)
> > > +#define GNTTAB_CACHE_INVAL (1<<1)
> > > + uint32_t op;
> > > +};
> > > +DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE_STRUCT(gnttab_cache_flush);
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > * Bitfield values for update_pin_status.flags.
> > > */
> > > /* Map the grant entry for access by I/O devices. */
> >
> > If the ARM bits are correct, have a
> >
> > Reviewed-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> >
> > for the common header.
> >
> > David
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-03 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-03 14:52 [PATCH v2 0/2] introduce XENMEM_cache_flush Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-03 14:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] xen/arm: remove handling of XENFEAT_grant_map_identity Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-03 14:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] xen/arm: introduce GNTTABOP_cache_flush Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-03 15:05 ` David Vrabel
2014-10-03 16:20 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-03 16:34 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2014-10-03 16:36 ` David Vrabel
2014-10-03 16:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1412354047.12695.38.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).