From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] arm: perf: limit size of accounting data
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:11:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1413897084-19715-5-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413897084-19715-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Commit 3fc2c83087 (ARM: perf: remove event limit from pmu_hw_events) got
rid of the upper limit on the number of events an arm_pmu could handle,
but introduced additional complexity and places a burden on each PMU
driver to allocate accounting data somehow. So far this has not
generally been useful as the only users of arm_pmu are the CPU backend
and the CCI driver.
Now that the CCI driver plugs into the perf subsystem directly, we can
remove some of the complexities that get in the way of supporting
heterogeneous CPU PMUs.
This patch restores the original limits on pmu_hw_events fields such
that the pmu_hw_events data can be allocated as a contiguous block. This
will simplify dynamic pmu_hw_events allocation in later patches.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h | 4 ++--
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 4 +---
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c | 4 ----
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
index ff39290..3d7e30b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
@@ -68,13 +68,13 @@ struct pmu_hw_events {
/*
* The events that are active on the PMU for the given index.
*/
- struct perf_event **events;
+ struct perf_event *events[ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS];
/*
* A 1 bit for an index indicates that the counter is being used for
* an event. A 0 means that the counter can be used.
*/
- unsigned long *used_mask;
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(used_mask, ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS);
/*
* Hardware lock to serialize accesses to PMU registers. Needed for the
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
index f0bbd3d..01db868 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -275,14 +275,12 @@ validate_group(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct perf_event *sibling, *leader = event->group_leader;
struct pmu_hw_events fake_pmu;
- DECLARE_BITMAP(fake_used_mask, ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS);
/*
* Initialise the fake PMU. We only need to populate the
* used_mask for the purposes of validation.
*/
- memset(fake_used_mask, 0, sizeof(fake_used_mask));
- fake_pmu.used_mask = fake_used_mask;
+ memset(&fake_pmu.used_mask, 0, sizeof(fake_pmu.used_mask));
if (!validate_event(&fake_pmu, leader))
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
index ed7bb04f..ff4a47f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
@@ -36,8 +36,6 @@
static struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu;
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct arm_pmu *, percpu_pmu);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_event * [ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS], hw_events);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [BITS_TO_LONGS(ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS)], used_mask);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pmu_hw_events, cpu_hw_events);
/*
@@ -172,8 +170,6 @@ static void cpu_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
int cpu;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct pmu_hw_events *events = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
- events->events = per_cpu(hw_events, cpu);
- events->used_mask = per_cpu(used_mask, cpu);
raw_spin_lock_init(&events->pmu_lock);
per_cpu(percpu_pmu, cpu) = cpu_pmu;
}
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-21 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-21 13:11 [PATCH 0/8] Prepatory rework for multi-PMU support Mark Rutland
2014-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 1/8] arm: perf: factor out callchain code Mark Rutland
2014-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 2/8] arm: perf: make PMU probing data-driven Mark Rutland
2014-10-21 21:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-22 9:50 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 3/8] arm: perf: use IDR types for CPU PMUs Mark Rutland
2014-10-21 21:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-22 10:06 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-27 20:29 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-21 13:11 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2014-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 5/8] arm: perf: kill get_hw_events() Mark Rutland
2014-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 6/8] arm: perf: fold percpu_pmu into pmu_hw_events Mark Rutland
2014-10-21 22:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-22 10:10 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 7/8] arm: perf: dynamically allocate cpu hardware data Mark Rutland
2014-10-21 21:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-22 11:06 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 8/8] arm: perf: fold hotplug notifier into arm_pmu Mark Rutland
2014-10-21 22:18 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1413897084-19715-5-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).