From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: matt.fleming@intel.com (Matt Fleming) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 17:45:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 00/10] arm64 EFI patches for 3.19 In-Reply-To: References: <1413987713-30528-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20141027115055.GM8768@arm.com> Message-ID: <1414431927.7122.471.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 13:03 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > Yeah, I was struggling a bit with that. I think the agreement was that > everything EFI related goes through Matt's tree, but I don't think > that necessarily makes sense for patches that only touch arch/arm64, > unless there are interdependencies with the generic code. > > From this series, only patches #7 and #8 need to go through Matt's > tree, and even if #9 and #10 are also related to SMBIOS, they are in > fact orthogonal to #7 and #8, so those can still go through the arm64 > tree without any merge order issues later on. > > @Matt: any thoughts? In this case, if it makes things easier for you folks in terms of dependencies to take this *all* through the arm64 tree, that seems sensible to me.