[PATCH resend 0/4] clk: sunxi: Unify sun4i apb1 clock

[PATCH resend 0/4] clk: sunxi: Unify sun4i apb1 clock

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

(resent with linux-arm-kernel CCed)

Hi everyone,

This series unifies the apb1 clock driver for sun4i, which was
previously split into apb1-mux and apb1. This also fixes the
apb2 clock on sun6i/sun8i, which we now have documents for.

The first 2 patches were done by Emilio.

Patch 1 unifies the apb1-mux and apb1 clock drivers using a
factors clock.

Patch 2 unifies said clocks in the dtsi.

Patch 3 switches the compatibles for apb2 clock on sun6i/sun8i to
the unified sun4i apb1 clock.

Patch 4 gets rid of the incorrect and now unused sun6i apb2 clock
driver.


Cheers
ChenYu


Chen-Yu Tsai (2):
  ARM: dts: sunxi: Use sun4i-a10-apb1-clk for sun6i/sun8i apb2 clocks.
  clk: sunxi: Removed unused/incorrect sun6i-a31-apb2-clk driver

Emilio L?pez (2):
  clk: sunxi: unify APB1 clock
  ARM: dts: sunxi: unify APB1 clock

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt |  2 --
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi                  | 12 ++----------
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a10s.dtsi                 | 12 ++----------
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13.dtsi                  | 12 ++----------
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi                  | 12 ++----------
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi                  | 12 ++----------
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a23.dtsi                  | 12 ++----------
 drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c                     | 14 ++------------
 8 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.1

[PATCH resend 1/4] clk: sunxi: unify APB1 clock

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

From: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>

This commit unifies the APB1 mux with the APB1 clock, using the new
factors infrastructure.

Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
[wens at csie.org: Add mux mask bits]
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt | 1 -
 drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c                     | 7 ++-----
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
index 0455cb9..6ddcf6e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ Required properties:
 	"allwinner,sun9i-a80-apb0-gates-clk" - for the APB0 gates on A80
 	"allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-clk" - for the APB1 clock
 	"allwinner,sun9i-a80-apb1-clk" - for the APB1 bus clock on A80
-	"allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-mux-clk" - for the APB1 clock muxing
 	"allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-gates-clk" - for the APB1 gates on A10
 	"allwinner,sun5i-a13-apb1-gates-clk" - for the APB1 gates on A13
 	"allwinner,sun5i-a10s-apb1-gates-clk" - for the APB1 gates on A10s
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
index 20f47c6..4133e27 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
@@ -507,6 +507,8 @@ static const struct factors_data sun6i_a31_pll6_data __initconst = {
 };
 
 static const struct factors_data sun4i_apb1_data __initconst = {
+	.mux = 24,
+	.muxmask = BIT(1) | BIT(0),
 	.table = &sun4i_apb1_config,
 	.getter = sun4i_get_apb1_factors,
 };
@@ -545,10 +547,6 @@ static const struct mux_data sun6i_a31_ahb1_mux_data __initconst = {
 	.shift = 12,
 };
 
-static const struct mux_data sun4i_apb1_mux_data __initconst = {
-	.shift = 24,
-};
-
 static void __init sunxi_mux_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
 				       struct mux_data *data)
 {
@@ -1109,7 +1107,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id clk_divs_match[] __initconst = {
 /* Matches for mux clocks */
 static const struct of_device_id clk_mux_match[] __initconst = {
 	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-cpu-clk", .data = &sun4i_cpu_mux_data,},
-	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-mux-clk", .data = &sun4i_apb1_mux_data,},
 	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ahb1-mux-clk", .data = &sun6i_a31_ahb1_mux_data,},
 	{}
 };
-- 
2.1.1

[PATCH resend 2/4] ARM: dts: sunxi: unify APB1 clock

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

From: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>

With the new factors infrastructure in place, we can unify apb1 and
apb1_mux as a single clock now.

Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
[wens at csie.org: Change apb1 node label to "apb1"; reword commit title]
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi  | 12 ++----------
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a10s.dtsi | 12 ++----------
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13.dtsi  | 12 ++----------
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi  | 12 ++----------
 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi
index 380f914..5e2ec2d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi
@@ -174,19 +174,11 @@
 				"apb0_ir1", "apb0_keypad";
 		};
 
-		apb1_mux: apb1_mux at 01c20058 {
-			#clock-cells = <0>;
-			compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-mux-clk";
-			reg = <0x01c20058 0x4>;
-			clocks = <&osc24M>, <&pll6 1>, <&osc32k>;
-			clock-output-names = "apb1_mux";
-		};
-
-		apb1: apb1 at 01c20058 {
+		apb1: clk at 01c20058 {
 			#clock-cells = <0>;
 			compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-clk";
 			reg = <0x01c20058 0x4>;
-			clocks = <&apb1_mux>;
+			clocks = <&osc24M>, <&pll6 1>, <&osc32k>;
 			clock-output-names = "apb1";
 		};
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a10s.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a10s.dtsi
index 531272c..d2a8514 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a10s.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a10s.dtsi
@@ -162,19 +162,11 @@
 				"apb0_ir", "apb0_keypad";
 		};
 
-		apb1_mux: apb1_mux at 01c20058 {
-			#clock-cells = <0>;
-			compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-mux-clk";
-			reg = <0x01c20058 0x4>;
-			clocks = <&osc24M>, <&pll6 1>, <&osc32k>;
-			clock-output-names = "apb1_mux";
-		};
-
-		apb1: apb1 at 01c20058 {
+		apb1: clk at 01c20058 {
 			#clock-cells = <0>;
 			compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-clk";
 			reg = <0x01c20058 0x4>;
-			clocks = <&apb1_mux>;
+			clocks = <&osc24M>, <&pll6 1>, <&osc32k>;
 			clock-output-names = "apb1";
 		};
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13.dtsi
index b131068..c35217e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13.dtsi
@@ -161,19 +161,11 @@
 			clock-output-names = "apb0_codec", "apb0_pio", "apb0_ir";
 		};
 
-		apb1_mux: apb1_mux at 01c20058 {
-			#clock-cells = <0>;
-			compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-mux-clk";
-			reg = <0x01c20058 0x4>;
-			clocks = <&osc24M>, <&pll6 1>, <&osc32k>;
-			clock-output-names = "apb1_mux";
-		};
-
-		apb1: apb1 at 01c20058 {
+		apb1: clk at 01c20058 {
 			#clock-cells = <0>;
 			compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-clk";
 			reg = <0x01c20058 0x4>;
-			clocks = <&apb1_mux>;
+			clocks = <&osc24M>, <&pll6 1>, <&osc32k>;
 			clock-output-names = "apb1";
 		};
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi
index 45bb916..8605f2b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi
@@ -222,19 +222,11 @@
 				"apb0_iis2", "apb0_keypad";
 		};
 
-		apb1_mux: apb1_mux at 01c20058 {
-			#clock-cells = <0>;
-			compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-mux-clk";
-			reg = <0x01c20058 0x4>;
-			clocks = <&osc24M>, <&pll6 1>, <&osc32k>;
-			clock-output-names = "apb1_mux";
-		};
-
-		apb1: apb1 at 01c20058 {
+		apb1: clk at 01c20058 {
 			#clock-cells = <0>;
 			compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-clk";
 			reg = <0x01c20058 0x4>;
-			clocks = <&apb1_mux>;
+			clocks = <&osc24M>, <&pll6 1>, <&osc32k>;
 			clock-output-names = "apb1";
 		};
 
-- 
2.1.1

[PATCH resend 3/4] ARM: dts: sunxi: Use sun4i-a10-apb1-clk for sun6i/sun8i apb2 clocks.

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

The apb2 clocks are actually the same as apb1 clocks on the other sunxi
platforms, hence compatible with "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-clk".

Update the dtsi to use the new unified apb1 clk.

Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi | 12 ++----------
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a23.dtsi | 12 ++----------
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi
index e80288e..3a51151 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi
@@ -217,19 +217,11 @@
 					"apb1_daudio1";
 		};
 
-		apb2_mux: apb2_mux at 01c20058 {
+		apb2: clk at 01c20058 {
 			#clock-cells = <0>;
-			compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-mux-clk";
+			compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-clk";
 			reg = <0x01c20058 0x4>;
 			clocks = <&osc32k>, <&osc24M>, <&pll6>, <&pll6>;
-			clock-output-names = "apb2_mux";
-		};
-
-		apb2: apb2 at 01c20058 {
-			#clock-cells = <0>;
-			compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-apb2-div-clk";
-			reg = <0x01c20058 0x4>;
-			clocks = <&apb2_mux>;
 			clock-output-names = "apb2";
 		};
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a23.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a23.dtsi
index 6086adb..0746cd1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a23.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a23.dtsi
@@ -189,19 +189,11 @@
 					"apb1_daudio0",	"apb1_daudio1";
 		};
 
-		apb2_mux: apb2_mux_clk at 01c20058 {
+		apb2: clk at 01c20058 {
 			#clock-cells = <0>;
-			compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-mux-clk";
+			compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-clk";
 			reg = <0x01c20058 0x4>;
 			clocks = <&osc32k>, <&osc24M>, <&pll6>, <&pll6>;
-			clock-output-names = "apb2_mux";
-		};
-
-		apb2: apb2_clk at 01c20058 {
-			#clock-cells = <0>;
-			compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-apb2-div-clk";
-			reg = <0x01c20058 0x4>;
-			clocks = <&apb2_mux>;
 			clock-output-names = "apb2";
 		};
 
-- 
2.1.1

[PATCH resend 4/4] clk: sunxi: Removed unused/incorrect sun6i-a31-apb2-clk driver

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

This driver does not match the hardware, which is actually compatible
to sun4i-a10-apb1-clk. Since we've switch to the correct one, drop
this driver.

Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt | 1 -
 drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c                     | 7 -------
 2 files changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
index 6ddcf6e..d199f91 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
@@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ Required properties:
 	"allwinner,sun7i-a20-apb1-gates-clk" - for the APB1 gates on A20
 	"allwinner,sun8i-a23-apb1-gates-clk" - for the APB1 gates on A23
 	"allwinner,sun9i-a80-apb1-gates-clk" - for the APB1 gates on A80
-	"allwinner,sun6i-a31-apb2-div-clk" - for the APB2 gates on A31
 	"allwinner,sun6i-a31-apb2-gates-clk" - for the APB2 gates on A31
 	"allwinner,sun8i-a23-apb2-gates-clk" - for the APB2 gates on A23
 	"allwinner,sun5i-a13-mbus-clk" - for the MBUS clock on A13
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
index 4133e27..46d98e3 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
@@ -632,12 +632,6 @@ static const struct div_data sun4i_apb0_data __initconst = {
 	.table	= sun4i_apb0_table,
 };
 
-static const struct div_data sun6i_a31_apb2_div_data __initconst = {
-	.shift	= 0,
-	.pow	= 0,
-	.width	= 4,
-};
-
 static void __init sunxi_divider_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
 					   struct div_data *data)
 {
@@ -1093,7 +1087,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id clk_div_match[] __initconst = {
 	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23-axi-clk", .data = &sun8i_a23_axi_data,},
 	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-ahb-clk", .data = &sun4i_ahb_data,},
 	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb0-clk", .data = &sun4i_apb0_data,},
-	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-apb2-div-clk", .data = &sun6i_a31_apb2_div_data,},
 	{}
 };
 
-- 
2.1.1

[PATCH resend 0/4] clk: sunxi: Unify sun4i apb1 clock

[Maxime Ripard]

On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 11:40:28AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> (resent with linux-arm-kernel CCed)
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> This series unifies the apb1 clock driver for sun4i, which was
> previously split into apb1-mux and apb1. This also fixes the
> apb2 clock on sun6i/sun8i, which we now have documents for.
> 
> The first 2 patches were done by Emilio.
> 
> Patch 1 unifies the apb1-mux and apb1 clock drivers using a
> factors clock.
> 
> Patch 2 unifies said clocks in the dtsi.
> 
> Patch 3 switches the compatibles for apb2 clock on sun6i/sun8i to
> the unified sun4i apb1 clock.
> 
> Patch 4 gets rid of the incorrect and now unused sun6i apb2 clock
> driver.

Merged all the patches, thanks!

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141111/51eabbf6/attachment.sig>

[PATCH resend 0/4] clk: sunxi: Unify sun4i apb1 clock

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 11:40:28AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> (resent with linux-arm-kernel CCed)
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> This series unifies the apb1 clock driver for sun4i, which was
>> previously split into apb1-mux and apb1. This also fixes the
>> apb2 clock on sun6i/sun8i, which we now have documents for.
>>
>> The first 2 patches were done by Emilio.
>>
>> Patch 1 unifies the apb1-mux and apb1 clock drivers using a
>> factors clock.
>>
>> Patch 2 unifies said clocks in the dtsi.
>>
>> Patch 3 switches the compatibles for apb2 clock on sun6i/sun8i to
>> the unified sun4i apb1 clock.
>>
>> Patch 4 gets rid of the incorrect and now unused sun6i apb2 clock
>> driver.
>
> Merged all the patches, thanks!

Thanks! I'll send out sun6i ahb1 unification v3 later.

ChenYu

[PATCH resend 2/4] ARM: dts: sunxi: unify APB1 clock

[Kevin Hilman]

Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> writes:

> From: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
>
> With the new factors infrastructure in place, we can unify apb1 and
> apb1_mux as a single clock now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> [wens at csie.org: Change apb1 node label to "apb1"; reword commit title]
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>

Boot breakage in arm-soc/for-next on sun4i-a10-cubieboard and
sun7i-a20-cubieboard2[1] was bisected down to this patch[1].

Reverting $SUBJECT on top of arm-soc gets things booting again.

Kevin

[1] http://status.armcloud.us/boot/?cubie
[2]
e883d67285e9267c73f8d2b9d32aa9e712ad00a4 is the first bad commit
commit e883d67285e9267c73f8d2b9d32aa9e712ad00a4
Author: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
Date:   Thu Nov 6 11:40:30 2014 +0800

    ARM: dts: sunxi: unify APB1 clock

    With the new factors infrastructure in place, we can unify apb1 and
    apb1_mux as a single clock now.

    Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
    [wens at csie.org: Change apb1 node label to "apb1"; reword commit
    title]
    Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
    Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>

:040000 040000 ab2fd24827d8610215cfd517106f38f359e39f86 1d836ee4f4a2ff442d7d38829f87b72c32152bcc M      arch
bisect run success

[PATCH resend 2/4] ARM: dts: sunxi: unify APB1 clock

[Maxime Ripard]

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 02:04:01PM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> writes:
> 
> > From: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> >
> > With the new factors infrastructure in place, we can unify apb1 and
> > apb1_mux as a single clock now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> > [wens at csie.org: Change apb1 node label to "apb1"; reword commit title]
> > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> 
> Boot breakage in arm-soc/for-next on sun4i-a10-cubieboard and
> sun7i-a20-cubieboard2[1] was bisected down to this patch[1].
> 
> Reverting $SUBJECT on top of arm-soc gets things booting again.

I guess this is because arm-soc's doesn't have linux-next's
93746e70be83a3f113134a16065957b324af50f7

Which also explains why linux-next still boots.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141121/260f3bd9/attachment.sig>

[PATCH resend 2/4] ARM: dts: sunxi: unify APB1 clock

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday 20 November 2014 14:04:01 Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> writes:
> 
> > From: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> >
> > With the new factors infrastructure in place, we can unify apb1 and
> > apb1_mux as a single clock now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> > [wens at csie.org: Change apb1 node label to "apb1"; reword commit title]
> > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> 
> Boot breakage in arm-soc/for-next on sun4i-a10-cubieboard and
> sun7i-a20-cubieboard2[1] was bisected down to this patch[1].
> 
> Reverting $SUBJECT on top of arm-soc gets things booting again.
> 

As this looks like it was intended as a cleanup without functional
changes, I would go ahead and revert it in next/dt.

Any objections?

	Arnd

[PATCH resend 2/4] ARM: dts: sunxi: unify APB1 clock

[Maxime Ripard]

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:57:02PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 20 November 2014 14:04:01 Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> writes:
> > 
> > > From: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> > >
> > > With the new factors infrastructure in place, we can unify apb1 and
> > > apb1_mux as a single clock now.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> > > [wens at csie.org: Change apb1 node label to "apb1"; reword commit title]
> > > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> > 
> > Boot breakage in arm-soc/for-next on sun4i-a10-cubieboard and
> > sun7i-a20-cubieboard2[1] was bisected down to this patch[1].
> > 
> > Reverting $SUBJECT on top of arm-soc gets things booting again.
> > 
> 
> As this looks like it was intended as a cleanup without functional
> changes, I would go ahead and revert it in next/dt.
> 
> Any objections?

Yeah, you'd break linux-next as well doing so, as the clock driver now
requires this from the DT.

I can merge it through the clock tree though if you prefer it that
way.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141121/47207e47/attachment.sig>

[PATCH resend 2/4] ARM: dts: sunxi: unify APB1 clock

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 21 November 2014 15:29:03 Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:57:02PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 November 2014 14:04:01 Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > > Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> writes:
> > > 
> > > > From: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> > > >
> > > > With the new factors infrastructure in place, we can unify apb1 and
> > > > apb1_mux as a single clock now.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> > > > [wens at csie.org: Change apb1 node label to "apb1"; reword commit title]
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> > > 
> > > Boot breakage in arm-soc/for-next on sun4i-a10-cubieboard and
> > > sun7i-a20-cubieboard2[1] was bisected down to this patch[1].
> > > 
> > > Reverting $SUBJECT on top of arm-soc gets things booting again.
> > > 
> > 
> > As this looks like it was intended as a cleanup without functional
> > changes, I would go ahead and revert it in next/dt.
> > 
> > Any objections?
> 
> Yeah, you'd break linux-next as well doing so, as the clock driver now
> requires this from the DT.
> 
> I can merge it through the clock tree though if you prefer it that
> way.

Do you know why this commit breaks booting then?

	Arnd

[PATCH resend 2/4] ARM: dts: sunxi: unify APB1 clock

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 21 November 2014 15:35:57 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 21 November 2014 15:29:03 Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:57:02PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Thursday 20 November 2014 14:04:01 Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > > > Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> writes:
> > > > 
> > > > > From: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> > > > >
> > > > > With the new factors infrastructure in place, we can unify apb1 and
> > > > > apb1_mux as a single clock now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> > > > > [wens at csie.org: Change apb1 node label to "apb1"; reword commit title]
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> > > > 
> > > > Boot breakage in arm-soc/for-next on sun4i-a10-cubieboard and
> > > > sun7i-a20-cubieboard2[1] was bisected down to this patch[1].
> > > > 
> > > > Reverting $SUBJECT on top of arm-soc gets things booting again.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > As this looks like it was intended as a cleanup without functional
> > > changes, I would go ahead and revert it in next/dt.
> > > 
> > > Any objections?
> > 
> > Yeah, you'd break linux-next as well doing so, as the clock driver now
> > requires this from the DT.
> > 
> > I can merge it through the clock tree though if you prefer it that
> > way.
> 
> Do you know why this commit breaks booting then?
> 

I have now reverted the entire branch, to get things working again.

Please send a new pull request once you have a version that you 
have actually tested.

	Arnd

[PATCH resend 2/4] ARM: dts: sunxi: unify APB1 clock

[Maxime Ripard]

Arnd,

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 05:08:08PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 21 November 2014 15:35:57 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 21 November 2014 15:29:03 Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:57:02PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 20 November 2014 14:04:01 Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > > > > Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> writes:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > From: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > With the new factors infrastructure in place, we can unify apb1 and
> > > > > > apb1_mux as a single clock now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> > > > > > [wens at csie.org: Change apb1 node label to "apb1"; reword commit title]
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Boot breakage in arm-soc/for-next on sun4i-a10-cubieboard and
> > > > > sun7i-a20-cubieboard2[1] was bisected down to this patch[1].
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reverting $SUBJECT on top of arm-soc gets things booting again.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > As this looks like it was intended as a cleanup without functional
> > > > changes, I would go ahead and revert it in next/dt.
> > > > 
> > > > Any objections?
> > > 
> > > Yeah, you'd break linux-next as well doing so, as the clock driver now
> > > requires this from the DT.
> > > 
> > > I can merge it through the clock tree though if you prefer it that
> > > way.
> > 
> > Do you know why this commit breaks booting then?
> > 
> 
> I have now reverted the entire branch, to get things working again.
> 
> Please send a new pull request once you have a version that you 
> have actually tested.

This was tested and working. And again, the linux-next proves it.

I know very well why it doesn't work, and it's actually expected: some
clock was refactored, the DT needed to be changed, only half of it was
merged through arm-soc.

It really is just because one part got through arm-soc, the other
through the clock tree, nothing more.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141122/c90a5c94/attachment.sig>

[PATCH resend 2/4] ARM: dts: sunxi: unify APB1 clock

[Kevin Hilman]

Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> writes:

> Arnd,
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 05:08:08PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Friday 21 November 2014 15:35:57 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > On Friday 21 November 2014 15:29:03 Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:57:02PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > > > On Thursday 20 November 2014 14:04:01 Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> > > > > Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> writes:
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > > From: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > With the new factors infrastructure in place, we can unify apb1 and
>> > > > > > apb1_mux as a single clock now.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
>> > > > > > [wens at csie.org: Change apb1 node label to "apb1"; reword commit title]
>> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > Boot breakage in arm-soc/for-next on sun4i-a10-cubieboard and
>> > > > > sun7i-a20-cubieboard2[1] was bisected down to this patch[1].
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > Reverting $SUBJECT on top of arm-soc gets things booting again.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > 
>> > > > As this looks like it was intended as a cleanup without functional
>> > > > changes, I would go ahead and revert it in next/dt.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Any objections?
>> > > 
>> > > Yeah, you'd break linux-next as well doing so, as the clock driver now
>> > > requires this from the DT.
>> > > 
>> > > I can merge it through the clock tree though if you prefer it that
>> > > way.
>> > 
>> > Do you know why this commit breaks booting then?
>> > 
>> 
>> I have now reverted the entire branch, to get things working again.
>> 
>> Please send a new pull request once you have a version that you 
>> have actually tested.
>
> This was tested and working. And again, the linux-next proves it.
>
> I know very well why it doesn't work, and it's actually expected: some
> clock was refactored, the DT needed to be changed, only half of it was
> merged through arm-soc.
>
> It really is just because one part got through arm-soc, the other
> through the clock tree, nothing more.

Which branch (already in linux-next) would be needed in arm-soc/for-next
to resolve the dependency?

Kevin

[PATCH resend 2/4] ARM: dts: sunxi: unify APB1 clock

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi Kevin,

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 07:51:40AM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> writes:
> 
> > Arnd,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 05:08:08PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Friday 21 November 2014 15:35:57 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> > On Friday 21 November 2014 15:29:03 Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >> > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:57:02PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> > > > On Thursday 20 November 2014 14:04:01 Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> > > > > Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> writes:
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > > From: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > With the new factors infrastructure in place, we can unify apb1 and
> >> > > > > > apb1_mux as a single clock now.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> >> > > > > > [wens at csie.org: Change apb1 node label to "apb1"; reword commit title]
> >> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > Boot breakage in arm-soc/for-next on sun4i-a10-cubieboard and
> >> > > > > sun7i-a20-cubieboard2[1] was bisected down to this patch[1].
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > Reverting $SUBJECT on top of arm-soc gets things booting again.
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > As this looks like it was intended as a cleanup without functional
> >> > > > changes, I would go ahead and revert it in next/dt.
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Any objections?
> >> > > 
> >> > > Yeah, you'd break linux-next as well doing so, as the clock driver now
> >> > > requires this from the DT.
> >> > > 
> >> > > I can merge it through the clock tree though if you prefer it that
> >> > > way.
> >> > 
> >> > Do you know why this commit breaks booting then?
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> I have now reverted the entire branch, to get things working again.
> >> 
> >> Please send a new pull request once you have a version that you 
> >> have actually tested.
> >
> > This was tested and working. And again, the linux-next proves it.
> >
> > I know very well why it doesn't work, and it's actually expected: some
> > clock was refactored, the DT needed to be changed, only half of it was
> > merged through arm-soc.
> >
> > It really is just because one part got through arm-soc, the other
> > through the clock tree, nothing more.
> 
> Which branch (already in linux-next) would be needed in arm-soc/for-next
> to resolve the dependency?

It used to be part of the sunxi/for-next branch I maintain, but the
part that would solve it has not been picked up by Mike.

You can drop this pull request anyway, I just sent a new one dropping
this patch, which will go through the clock tree.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141124/a7687bdb/attachment-0001.sig>