[PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Play nice on non-ARM/SMMU systems

[PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Play nice on non-ARM/SMMU systems

[Thierry Reding]

From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

Currently the driver registers IOMMU bus operations for all busses even
if no ARM SMMU is present on a system. Depending on the driver probing
order this prevents the driver for the real IOMMU to register itself as
the bus-wide IOMMU.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index 60558f794922..e154826d8b1d 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -2072,8 +2072,20 @@ static struct platform_driver arm_smmu_driver = {
 
 static int __init arm_smmu_init(void)
 {
+	struct device_node *np;
 	int ret;
 
+	/*
+	 * Play nice with systems that don't have an ARM SMMU by checking that
+	 * an ARM SMMU exists in the system before proceeding with the driver
+	 * and IOMMU bus operation registration.
+	 */
+	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, arm_smmu_of_match);
+	if (!np)
+		return 0;
+
+	of_node_put(np);
+
 	ret = platform_driver_register(&arm_smmu_driver);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-- 
2.1.3

[PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Play nice on non-ARM/SMMU systems

[Will Deacon]

On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:26:18PM +0000, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> 
> Currently the driver registers IOMMU bus operations for all busses even
> if no ARM SMMU is present on a system. Depending on the driver probing
> order this prevents the driver for the real IOMMU to register itself as
> the bus-wide IOMMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index 60558f794922..e154826d8b1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -2072,8 +2072,20 @@ static struct platform_driver arm_smmu_driver = {
>  
>  static int __init arm_smmu_init(void)
>  {
> +	struct device_node *np;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Play nice with systems that don't have an ARM SMMU by checking that
> +	 * an ARM SMMU exists in the system before proceeding with the driver
> +	 * and IOMMU bus operation registration.
> +	 */
> +	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, arm_smmu_of_match);
> +	if (!np)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	of_node_put(np);
> +

Hopefully, this will be solved shortly by the of_iommu_configure series I've
been dragging my feet with recently. However, since that's not done yet,
this looks like the best thing for now, even if it's a bit of a bodge.

Have you checked/updated other IOMMMU drivers too?

Will

[PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Play nice on non-ARM/SMMU systems

[Thierry Reding]

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:25:39PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:26:18PM +0000, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > 
> > Currently the driver registers IOMMU bus operations for all busses even
> > if no ARM SMMU is present on a system. Depending on the driver probing
> > order this prevents the driver for the real IOMMU to register itself as
> > the bus-wide IOMMU.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > index 60558f794922..e154826d8b1d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > @@ -2072,8 +2072,20 @@ static struct platform_driver arm_smmu_driver = {
> >  
> >  static int __init arm_smmu_init(void)
> >  {
> > +	struct device_node *np;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Play nice with systems that don't have an ARM SMMU by checking that
> > +	 * an ARM SMMU exists in the system before proceeding with the driver
> > +	 * and IOMMU bus operation registration.
> > +	 */
> > +	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, arm_smmu_of_match);
> > +	if (!np)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	of_node_put(np);
> > +
> 
> Hopefully, this will be solved shortly by the of_iommu_configure series I've
> been dragging my feet with recently. However, since that's not done yet,
> this looks like the best thing for now, even if it's a bit of a bodge.
> 
> Have you checked/updated other IOMMMU drivers too?

ARM SMMU was the only one being enabled on 64-bit where I noticed this,
but from a quick glance a couple of the other ARM driver are affected as
well. I'll see if I can find the time to come up with a similar patch.

Of course if these IOMMU drivers were proper drivers and bind to a
device, then this problem wouldn't exist in the first place.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141111/4f1cb4d7/attachment.sig>