public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: robert.jarzmik@free.fr (Robert Jarzmik)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: fix lubbock interrupts handling
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 19:42:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1417113721-9062-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> (raw)

When gpio-pxa was moved to drivers/pxa, it became a driver, and its
initialization and probing happen at postcore initcall. The lubbock code
used to install the chained lubbock interrupt handler at init_irq()
time.

The consequence of the gpio-pxa change is that the installed chained irq
handler lubbock_irq_handler() was overwritten in pxa_gpio_probe(_dt)(),
removing :
 - the handler
 - the falling edge detection setting of GPIO0, which revealed the
   interrupt request from the lubbock IO board.

As a fix, move the gpio0 chained handler setup to a place where we have
the guarantee that pxa_gpio_probe() was called before, so that lubbock
handler becomes the true IRQ chained handler of GPIO0, demuxing the
lubbock IO board interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
---
For Thomas: as a side note, I'm not very happy with this patch. What
            makes me unhappy is that I don't know how to express the
            dependency between gpio-pxa probe time and
            irq_set_chained_handler(irq, lubbock_irq_handler).

            At the moment I rely on the fact that
            lubbock_irq_device_init() is called as device initcall while
            pxa_gpio_probe() is called as postcore initcall.

            If you have a better idea I'm all ears.
---
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c
index d8a1be6..1f138f9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c
@@ -172,9 +172,6 @@ static void __init lubbock_init_irq(void)
 					 handle_level_irq);
 		set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
 	}
-
-	irq_set_chained_handler(PXA_GPIO_TO_IRQ(0), lubbock_irq_handler);
-	irq_set_irq_type(PXA_GPIO_TO_IRQ(0), IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
@@ -190,7 +187,13 @@ static struct syscore_ops lubbock_irq_syscore_ops = {
 
 static int __init lubbock_irq_device_init(void)
 {
+	int irq;
+
 	if (machine_is_lubbock()) {
+		irq = PXA_GPIO_TO_IRQ(0);
+		irq_set_chained_handler(irq, lubbock_irq_handler);
+		irq_set_irq_type(irq, IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING);
+
 		register_syscore_ops(&lubbock_irq_syscore_ops);
 		return 0;
 	}
-- 
2.1.0

             reply	other threads:[~2014-11-27 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-27 18:42 Robert Jarzmik [this message]
2014-11-27 22:03 ` [PATCH] ARM: pxa: fix lubbock interrupts handling Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-28 13:30   ` Robert Jarzmik
2014-11-28 16:02     ` Haojian Zhuang
2014-12-03 20:24       ` Robert Jarzmik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1417113721-9062-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --to=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox