From: robert.jarzmik@free.fr (Robert Jarzmik)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: fix lubbock interrupts handling
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 19:42:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1417113721-9062-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> (raw)
When gpio-pxa was moved to drivers/pxa, it became a driver, and its
initialization and probing happen at postcore initcall. The lubbock code
used to install the chained lubbock interrupt handler at init_irq()
time.
The consequence of the gpio-pxa change is that the installed chained irq
handler lubbock_irq_handler() was overwritten in pxa_gpio_probe(_dt)(),
removing :
- the handler
- the falling edge detection setting of GPIO0, which revealed the
interrupt request from the lubbock IO board.
As a fix, move the gpio0 chained handler setup to a place where we have
the guarantee that pxa_gpio_probe() was called before, so that lubbock
handler becomes the true IRQ chained handler of GPIO0, demuxing the
lubbock IO board interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
---
For Thomas: as a side note, I'm not very happy with this patch. What
makes me unhappy is that I don't know how to express the
dependency between gpio-pxa probe time and
irq_set_chained_handler(irq, lubbock_irq_handler).
At the moment I rely on the fact that
lubbock_irq_device_init() is called as device initcall while
pxa_gpio_probe() is called as postcore initcall.
If you have a better idea I'm all ears.
---
arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c
index d8a1be6..1f138f9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c
@@ -172,9 +172,6 @@ static void __init lubbock_init_irq(void)
handle_level_irq);
set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
}
-
- irq_set_chained_handler(PXA_GPIO_TO_IRQ(0), lubbock_irq_handler);
- irq_set_irq_type(PXA_GPIO_TO_IRQ(0), IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
@@ -190,7 +187,13 @@ static struct syscore_ops lubbock_irq_syscore_ops = {
static int __init lubbock_irq_device_init(void)
{
+ int irq;
+
if (machine_is_lubbock()) {
+ irq = PXA_GPIO_TO_IRQ(0);
+ irq_set_chained_handler(irq, lubbock_irq_handler);
+ irq_set_irq_type(irq, IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING);
+
register_syscore_ops(&lubbock_irq_syscore_ops);
return 0;
}
--
2.1.0
next reply other threads:[~2014-11-27 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-27 18:42 Robert Jarzmik [this message]
2014-11-27 22:03 ` [PATCH] ARM: pxa: fix lubbock interrupts handling Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-28 13:30 ` Robert Jarzmik
2014-11-28 16:02 ` Haojian Zhuang
2014-12-03 20:24 ` Robert Jarzmik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1417113721-9062-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--to=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox