From: tixy@linaro.org (Jon Medhurst (Tixy))
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: kprobes: check register usage for probed instruction
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:13:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1421165628.4215.63.camel@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421161268.4215.56.camel@linaro.org>
This patch utilizes the previously introduced checker to check
register usage for probed ARM instruction and saves it in a mask.
A further patch will use such information to avoid simulation or
emulation.
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org>
---
This patch applies my review comments on "[PATCH v19 10/11] ARM:
kprobes: check register usage for probed instruction."
It is also rebased on top of the kprobes-opt branch at
git://git.linaro.org/people/tixy/kernel.git
arch/arm/include/asm/probes.h | 1 +
arch/arm/probes/decode.c | 7 +++
arch/arm/probes/kprobes/actions-arm.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers-arm.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers.h | 1 +
5 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/probes.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/probes.h
index cd9e815..b668e60 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/probes.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/probes.h
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct arch_probes_insn {
probes_insn_singlestep_t *insn_singlestep;
probes_insn_fn_t *insn_fn;
int stack_space;
+ unsigned long register_usage_flags;
};
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/decode.c b/arch/arm/probes/decode.c
index f9d7c42..880ebe0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/probes/decode.c
+++ b/arch/arm/probes/decode.c
@@ -435,6 +435,13 @@ probes_decode_insn(probes_opcode_t insn, struct arch_probes_insn *asi,
*/
asi->stack_space = 0;
+ /*
+ * Similarly to stack_space, register_usage_flags is filled by
+ * checkers. Its default value is set to ~0, which is 'all
+ * registers are used', to prevent any potential optimization.
+ */
+ asi->register_usage_flags = ~0UL;
+
if (emulate)
insn = prepare_emulated_insn(insn, asi, thumb);
diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/actions-arm.c b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/actions-arm.c
index 06988ef..b9056d6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/actions-arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/actions-arm.c
@@ -341,4 +341,4 @@ const union decode_action kprobes_arm_actions[NUM_PROBES_ARM_ACTIONS] = {
[PROBES_LDMSTM] = {.decoder = kprobe_decode_ldmstm}
};
-const struct decode_checker *kprobes_arm_checkers[] = {arm_stack_checker, NULL};
+const struct decode_checker *kprobes_arm_checkers[] = {arm_stack_checker, arm_regs_checker, NULL};
diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers-arm.c b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers-arm.c
index f817663..7b98173 100644
--- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers-arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers-arm.c
@@ -97,3 +97,96 @@ const struct decode_checker arm_stack_checker[NUM_PROBES_ARM_ACTIONS] = {
[PROBES_STORE] = {.checker = arm_check_stack},
[PROBES_LDMSTM] = {.checker = arm_check_stack},
};
+
+static enum probes_insn __kprobes arm_check_regs_nouse(probes_opcode_t insn,
+ struct arch_probes_insn *asi,
+ const struct decode_header *h)
+{
+ asi->register_usage_flags = 0;
+ return INSN_GOOD;
+}
+
+static enum probes_insn arm_check_regs_normal(probes_opcode_t insn,
+ struct arch_probes_insn *asi,
+ const struct decode_header *h)
+{
+ u32 regs = h->type_regs.bits >> DECODE_TYPE_BITS;
+ int i;
+
+ asi->register_usage_flags = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < 5; regs >>= 4, insn >>= 4, i++)
+ if (regs & 0xf)
+ asi->register_usage_flags |= 1 << (insn & 0xf);
+
+ return INSN_GOOD;
+}
+
+
+static enum probes_insn arm_check_regs_ldmstm(probes_opcode_t insn,
+ struct arch_probes_insn *asi,
+ const struct decode_header *h)
+{
+ unsigned int reglist = insn & 0xffff;
+ unsigned int rn = (insn >> 16) & 0xf;
+ asi->register_usage_flags = reglist | (1 << rn);
+ return INSN_GOOD;
+}
+
+static enum probes_insn arm_check_regs_mov_ip_sp(probes_opcode_t insn,
+ struct arch_probes_insn *asi,
+ const struct decode_header *h)
+{
+ /* Instruction is 'mov ip, sp' i.e. 'mov r12, r13' */
+ asi->register_usage_flags = (1 << 12) | (1<< 13);
+ return INSN_GOOD;
+}
+
+/*
+ * | Rn |Rt/d| | Rm |
+ * LDRD (register) cccc 000x x0x0 xxxx xxxx xxxx 1101 xxxx
+ * STRD (register) cccc 000x x0x0 xxxx xxxx xxxx 1111 xxxx
+ * | Rn |Rt/d| |imm4L|
+ * LDRD (immediate) cccc 000x x1x0 xxxx xxxx xxxx 1101 xxxx
+ * STRD (immediate) cccc 000x x1x0 xxxx xxxx xxxx 1111 xxxx
+ *
+ * Such instructions access Rt/d and its next register, so different
+ * from others, a specific checker is required to handle this extra
+ * implicit register usage.
+ */
+static enum probes_insn arm_check_regs_ldrdstrd(probes_opcode_t insn,
+ struct arch_probes_insn *asi,
+ const struct decode_header *h)
+{
+ int rdt = (insn >> 12) & 0xf;
+ arm_check_regs_normal(insn, asi, h);
+ asi->register_usage_flags |= 1 << (rdt + 1);
+ return INSN_GOOD;
+}
+
+
+const struct decode_checker arm_regs_checker[NUM_PROBES_ARM_ACTIONS] = {
+ [PROBES_MRS] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_SATURATING_ARITHMETIC] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_MUL1] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_MUL2] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_MUL_ADD_LONG] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_MUL_ADD] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_LOAD] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_LOAD_EXTRA] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_STORE] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_STORE_EXTRA] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_DATA_PROCESSING_REG] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_DATA_PROCESSING_IMM] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_SEV] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_nouse},
+ [PROBES_WFE] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_nouse},
+ [PROBES_SATURATE] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_REV] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_MMI] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_PACK] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_EXTEND] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_EXTEND_ADD] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_BITFIELD] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_normal},
+ [PROBES_LDMSTM] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_ldmstm},
+ [PROBES_MOV_IP_SP] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_mov_ip_sp},
+ [PROBES_LDRSTRD] = {.checker = arm_check_regs_ldrdstrd},
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers.h b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers.h
index bddfa0e..cf6c9e7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers.h
+++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers.h
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ extern const union decode_action stack_check_actions[];
#ifndef CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL
extern const struct decode_checker arm_stack_checker[];
+extern const struct decode_checker arm_regs_checker[];
#else
#endif
extern const struct decode_checker t32_stack_checker[];
--
2.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-13 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-05 11:28 [PATCH v19 00/11] ARM: kprobes: OPTPROBES and other improvements Wang Nan
2015-01-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v19 01/11] ARM: probes: move all probe code to dedicate directory Wang Nan
2015-01-09 2:19 ` [PATCH v20 " Wang Nan
2015-01-09 9:47 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-01-09 9:50 ` Wang Nan
2015-01-09 2:28 ` [PATCH v19 " Wang Nan
2015-01-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v19 02/11] ARM: kprobes: remove unused ARM decoder actions Wang Nan
2015-01-07 11:50 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-01-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v19 03/11] ARM: kprobes: introduces checker Wang Nan
2015-01-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v19 04/11] ARM: kprobes: collects stack consumption for store instructions Wang Nan
2015-01-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v19 05/11] ARM: kprobes: disallow probing stack consuming instructions Wang Nan
2015-01-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v19 06/11] ARM: kprobes: Add test cases for " Wang Nan
2015-01-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v19 07/11] kprobes: Pass the original kprobe for preparing optimized kprobe Wang Nan
2015-01-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v19 08/11] ARM: kprobes: enable OPTPROBES for ARM 32 Wang Nan
2015-01-07 13:01 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-01-09 6:37 ` [PATCH v20 " Wang Nan
2015-01-09 10:25 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-01-09 10:55 ` Wang Nan
2015-01-09 16:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-09 17:28 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-01-09 17:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-09 19:18 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-01-09 6:51 ` [PATCH v19 " Wang Nan
2015-01-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v19 09/11] ARM: kprobes: Fix unreliable MRS instruction tests Wang Nan
2015-01-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v19 10/11] ARM: kprobes: check register usage for probed instruction Wang Nan
2015-01-13 15:01 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-01-13 16:13 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy) [this message]
2015-01-19 10:37 ` [PATCH] " Wang Nan
2015-01-05 11:34 ` [PATCH v19 11/11] ARM: optprobes: execute instruction during restoring if possible Wang Nan
2015-01-07 13:40 ` [PATCH v19 00/11] ARM: kprobes: OPTPROBES and other improvements Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-01-20 2:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1421165628.4215.63.camel@linaro.org \
--to=tixy@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).