From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com (Yingjoe Chen)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:23:25 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: Add pinctrl bindings for
 mt65xx/mt81xx.
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYRrs2=gNM1XGSh1cSo5Pvx6iNLt4HjL6gdTqGPWYSRDw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1415709535-31515-1-git-send-email-hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
 <1415709535-31515-3-git-send-email-hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
 <CACRpkdYSe_BH_qiHma2BA+c2otEi3wd0TBXy83t8vwrNL+3U2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141127101830.GP30369@pengutronix.de>
 <CACRpkdbMdJT6y-NL36RgQe0-CAFAVGqKiwY9+yFcwA7JDLmA+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141202135527.GM30369@pengutronix.de>
 <CACRpkdZeRd+j7d_iRphruHRg8p3XjqWK8_HQzLH2PTZ_pqOrYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150112122200.GC18908@pengutronix.de>
 <CACRpkdYXrdiRWMV8YpxrSLe2rLEV-ZnX7=36w21zGquh==6WgA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150113161614.GF23940@pengutronix.de>
 <CACRpkdYRrs2=gNM1XGSh1cSo5Pvx6iNLt4HjL6gdTqGPWYSRDw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1421403805.11671.58.camel@mtksdaap41>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 10:53 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:05:22AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 
> >> > You often talk about ambiguities. Could you give an example what
> >> > ambiguities you mean?
> >>
> >> What happened was this pins = ; arguments were sometimes
> >> strings and sometimes integers, that becomes strange to handle
> >> in code, ambiguous.
> >
> > I see. I like naming it 'pinmux' because that's what it is: pins and
> > mux settings. A plain 'pinno' suggests that it contains only pin mubers,
> > without mux setting. How about 'pin-no-mux'? We also could add an
> > explicit "pins-are-numbered" property instead of distinguishing this
> > by property names.
> 
> I kind of like this "pins-are-numbered" thing.
> 
> The other property for the pin, whether pinmux or pin-no-mux or
> pin-num-and-mux etc is no such big deal, as long as it's
> consistent and documented with the generic bindings.

Hi Linus,

To make sure I understand it correct, you think something like this is
OK?

	pinctrl at 01c20800 {
		compatible = "mediatek,mt8135-pinctrl";
[...]
		pins-are-numbered;

		i2c0_pins_a: i2c0 at 0 {
			pins1 {
				pins = <MT8135_PIN_100_SDA0__FUNC_SDA0>,
					<MT8135_PIN_101_SCL0__FUNC_SCL0>;
				bias-disable;
			};
		};
[....]
	}

Joe.C