From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches)
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:40:44 -0800
Subject: unclear ipv6 redirect message (was Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mfd:
 lubbock_io: add lubbock_io board)
In-Reply-To: <20150121161059.GT26493@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1421406010-14851-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
 <1421406010-14851-2-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
 <20150119091705.GG21886@x1> <87ppaah9k5.fsf@free.fr>
 <20150120102919.GP5767@x1> <20150120115658.GJ26493@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <873874fuei.fsf@free.fr> <20150121094453.GO26493@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <1421856321.10574.13.camel@perches.com>
 <20150121161059.GT26493@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <1421858444.10574.14.camel@perches.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 16:11 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 08:05:21AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > (adding netdev)
> 
> I wasn't actually reporting that as an issue; I was using it as an
> example.  It's from a very old kernel (2.6.27.21) which I run on one
> of my old x86 machines.

It's still the same code.
If the message can be improved, why not do it?