From: wangnan0@huawei.com (Wang Nan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 02/26] kprobes: makes kprobes/enabled works correctly for optimized kprobes.
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:40:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1423806022-61575-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423805941-61407-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
debugfs/kprobes/enabled doesn't work correctly on optimized kprobes.
Masami Hiramatsu has a test report on x86_64 platform:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/19/274
This patch forces it to unoptimize kprobe if kprobes_all_disarmed
is set. It also checks the flag in unregistering path for skipping
unneeded disarming process when kprobes globally disarmed.
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/kprobes.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index c397900..c90e417 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -869,7 +869,8 @@ static void __disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p, bool reopt)
{
struct kprobe *_p;
- unoptimize_kprobe(p, false); /* Try to unoptimize */
+ /* Try to unoptimize */
+ unoptimize_kprobe(p, kprobes_all_disarmed);
if (!kprobe_queued(p)) {
arch_disarm_kprobe(p);
@@ -1571,7 +1572,13 @@ static struct kprobe *__disable_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
/* Try to disarm and disable this/parent probe */
if (p == orig_p || aggr_kprobe_disabled(orig_p)) {
- disarm_kprobe(orig_p, true);
+ /*
+ * If kprobes_all_disarmed is set, orig_p
+ * should have already been disarmed, so
+ * skip unneed disarming process.
+ */
+ if (!kprobes_all_disarmed)
+ disarm_kprobe(orig_p, true);
orig_p->flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;
}
}
--
1.8.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-13 5:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-13 5:39 [RFC PATCH v3 00/26] Early kprobe: enable kprobes at very early booting stage Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/26] kprobes: set kprobes_all_disarmed earlier to enable re-optimization Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:40 ` Wang Nan [this message]
2015-02-13 5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/26] kprobes: x86: mark 2 bytes NOP as boostable Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/26] ftrace: don't update record flags if code modification fail Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/26] ftrace/x86: Ensure rec->flags no change when failure occures Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/26] ftrace: sort ftrace entries earlier Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/26] ftrace: allow search ftrace addr before ftrace fully inited Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/26] ftrace: enable make ftrace nop before ftrace_init() Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/26] ftrace: allow fixing code update failure by notifier chain Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/26] ftrace: x86: try to fix ftrace when ftrace_replace_code Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/26] early kprobes: introduce kprobe_is_early for futher early kprobe use Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/26] early kprobes: Add an KPROBE_FLAG_EARLY for early kprobe Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/26] early kprobes: ARM: directly modify code Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/26] early kprobes: ARM: introduce early kprobes related code area Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/26] early kprobes: x86: directly modify code Wang Nan
2015-02-20 4:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-02-13 5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/26] early kprobes: x86: introduce early kprobes related code area Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 17/26] early kprobes: introduces macros for allocing early kprobe resources Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 18/26] early kprobes: allows __alloc_insn_slot() from early kprobes slots Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 19/26] early kprobes: perhibit probing at early kprobe reserved area Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 20/26] early kprobes: core logic of eraly kprobes Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 21/26] early kprobes: add CONFIG_EARLY_KPROBES option Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 22/26] early kprobes: introduce arch_fix_ftrace_early_kprobe() Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 23/26] early kprobes: x86: arch_restore_optimized_kprobe() Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 24/26] early kprobes: core logic to support early kprobe on ftrace Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 25/26] early kprobes: introduce kconfig option " Wang Nan
2015-02-13 5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 26/26] kprobes: enable 'ekprobe=' cmdline option for early kprobes Wang Nan
2015-02-20 3:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/26] Early kprobe: enable kprobes at very early booting stage Masami Hiramatsu
2015-02-25 11:11 ` Wang Nan
2015-02-25 11:46 ` Wang Nan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1423806022-61575-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com \
--to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).