[PATCH 1/3] arm64: mediatek: Add config option for mt8173.

Catalin Marinas
2015-02-25T11:11:08Z

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:51:57AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 February 2015 17:07:22 Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 15:13 +0800, Hongzhou Yang wrote:
> > > From: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
> > >
> > > The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC,
> > > and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it.
> > > Add config options so we can build for one SoC only.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > > index e627ead..6213dac 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > > @@ -151,9 +151,15 @@ menu "Platform selection"
> > > config ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > > bool "Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx ARMv8 SoC"
> > > select ARM_GIC
> > > + select PINCTRL
> > > help
> > > Support for Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx ARMv8 SoCs
> > >
> > > +config MACH_MT8173
> > > + bool "Mediatek 8173 Soc Supprt"
> > > + depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > > + default y
> > > +
> > > config ARCH_SEATTLE
> > > bool "AMD Seattle SoC Family"
> > > help
> >
> > Hi Arnd/Matthias,
> >
> > Any comments on this patch?
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> Actually I just commented on a similar patch from Samsung the other
> day, and I think we should make a more general decision about these:
>
> I would rather see only one Kconfig option per SoC family and use
> ARCH_MEDIATEK without any MACH_* options. We can have other options
> for e.g. networking chips from Mediatek that are not closely related
> but I would group all the phone and tablet chips under one option
> here. Same for the other vendors of course.

I agree.

--
Catalin