From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/11] irqchip: gic: Fix unsafe locking reported by lockdep
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 16:37:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425659870-11832-6-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425659870-11832-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
When compiled with CONFIG_LOCKDEP, the kernel shouts badly, saying
that the locking in the GIC code is unsafe. I'm afraid the kernel
is right:
CPU0
----
lock(irq_controller_lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(irq_controller_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
This can happen while enabling, disabling, setting the type
or the affinity of an interrupt.
The fix is to take the interrupt_controller_lock with interrupts
disabled in these cases.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index 4634cf7..471e1cd 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -154,23 +154,25 @@ static inline unsigned int gic_irq(struct irq_data *d)
static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
+ unsigned long flags;
- raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_controller_lock, flags);
writel_relaxed(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
if (gic_arch_extn.irq_mask)
gic_arch_extn.irq_mask(d);
- raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_controller_lock, flags);
}
static void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
+ unsigned long flags;
- raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_controller_lock, flags);
if (gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask)
gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask(d);
writel_relaxed(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
- raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_controller_lock, flags);
}
static void gic_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
@@ -188,6 +190,7 @@ static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
{
void __iomem *base = gic_dist_base(d);
unsigned int gicirq = gic_irq(d);
+ unsigned long flags;
int ret;
/* Interrupt configuration for SGIs can't be changed */
@@ -199,14 +202,14 @@ static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)
return -EINVAL;
- raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_controller_lock, flags);
if (gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type)
gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type(d, type);
ret = gic_configure_irq(gicirq, type, base, NULL);
- raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_controller_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -227,6 +230,7 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
void __iomem *reg = gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_TARGET + (gic_irq(d) & ~3);
unsigned int cpu, shift = (gic_irq(d) % 4) * 8;
u32 val, mask, bit;
+ unsigned long flags;
if (!force)
cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
@@ -236,12 +240,12 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
if (cpu >= NR_GIC_CPU_IF || cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
return -EINVAL;
- raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_controller_lock, flags);
mask = 0xff << shift;
bit = gic_cpu_map[cpu] << shift;
val = readl_relaxed(reg) & ~mask;
writel_relaxed(val | bit, reg);
- raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_controller_lock, flags);
return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK;
}
--
2.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-06 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-06 16:37 [PATCH 00/11] Collection of GIC/GICv3 fixes for 4.0 Marc Zyngier
2015-03-06 16:37 ` [PATCH 01/11] irqchip: gicv3-its: Fix ITS CPU init Marc Zyngier
2015-03-06 16:37 ` [PATCH 02/11] irqchip: gicv3-its: Allocate enough memory for the full range of DeviceID Marc Zyngier
2015-03-06 16:37 ` [PATCH 03/11] irqchip: gicv3-its: Iterate over PCI aliases to generate ITS configuration Marc Zyngier
2015-03-06 16:37 ` [PATCH 04/11] irqchip: gicv3-its: Fix unsafe locking reported by lockdep Marc Zyngier
2015-03-06 16:37 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-03-06 16:37 ` [PATCH 06/11] irqchip: gic-v3: fix out of bounds access to cpu_logical_map Marc Zyngier
2015-03-06 16:37 ` [PATCH 07/11] irqchip: gicv3-its: zero itt before handling to hardware Marc Zyngier
2015-03-06 16:37 ` [PATCH 08/11] irqchip: gicv3-its: use 64KB page as default granule Marc Zyngier
2015-03-06 16:37 ` [PATCH 09/11] irqchip: gicv3-its: add limitation to page order Marc Zyngier
2015-03-06 16:37 ` [PATCH 10/11] irqchip: gicv3-its: define macros for GITS_CTLR fields Marc Zyngier
2015-03-06 16:37 ` [PATCH 11/11] irqchip: gicv3-its: support safe initialization Marc Zyngier
2015-03-08 5:56 ` [PATCH 00/11] Collection of GIC/GICv3 fixes for 4.0 Jason Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1425659870-11832-6-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).