From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: fix hyp mode mismatch detection
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:14:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1426263277-9827-4-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426263277-9827-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Commit 828e9834e9a5b7e6 ("arm64: head: create a new function for setting
the boot_cpu_mode flag") added BOOT_CPU_MODE_EL1, a nonzero value
replacing uses of zero. However it failed to update __boot_cpu_mode
appropriately.
A CPU booted at EL2 writes BOOT_CPU_MODE_EL2 to __boot_cpu_mode[0], and
a CPU booted at EL1 writes BOOT_CPU_MODE_EL1 to __boot_cpu_mode[1].
Later is_hyp_mode_mismatched() determines there to be a mismatch if
__boot_cpu_mode[0] != __boot_cpu_mode[1].
If all CPUs are booted at EL1, __boot_cpu_mode[0] will be set to
BOOT_CPU_MODE_EL1, but __boot_cpu_mode[1] will retain its initial value
of zero, and is_hyp_mode_mismatched will erroneously determine that the
boot modes are mismatched. This hasn't been a problem so far, but later
patches which will make use of is_hyp_mode_mismatched() expect it to
work correctly.
This patch initialises __boot_cpu_mode[1] to BOOT_CPU_MODE_EL1, fixing
the erroneous mismatch detection when all CPUs are booted at EL1.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/head.S | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
index 07f9305..d17649d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ ENDPROC(set_cpu_boot_mode_flag)
.align L1_CACHE_SHIFT
ENTRY(__boot_cpu_mode)
.long BOOT_CPU_MODE_EL2
- .long 0
+ .long BOOT_CPU_MODE_EL1
.popsection
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-13 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 16:14 [PATCH 0/4] arm64: boot fixes/updates Mark Rutland
2015-03-13 16:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: apply alternatives for !SMP kernels Mark Rutland
2015-03-17 16:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-13 16:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: head.S: fix __boot_cpu_mode alignment Mark Rutland
2015-03-13 16:14 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-03-13 20:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: fix hyp mode mismatch detection Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-16 10:56 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-16 11:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-16 11:05 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-17 15:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-13 16:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: log CPU boot modes Mark Rutland
2015-03-17 15:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-14 7:59 ` [PATCH 0/4] arm64: boot fixes/updates Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-16 10:53 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1426263277-9827-4-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).