From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lauraa@codeaurora.org (Laura Abbott) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:08:35 -0700 Subject: [PATCHv3] mm: Don't offset memmap for flatmem Message-ID: <1426291715-16242-1-git-send-email-lauraa@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Srinivas Kandagatla reported bad page messages when trying to remove the bottom 2MB on an ARM based IFC6410 board BUG: Bad page state in process swapper pfn:fffa8 page:ef7fb500 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0 flags: 0x96640253(locked|error|dirty|active|arch_1|reclaim|mlocked) page dumped because: PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE flag(s) set bad because of flags: flags: 0x200041(locked|active|mlocked) Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 3.19.0-rc3-00007-g412f9ba-dirty #816 Hardware name: Qualcomm (Flattened Device Tree) [] (unwind_backtrace) from [] (show_stack+0x20/0x24) [] (show_stack) from [] (dump_stack+0x80/0x9c) [] (dump_stack) from [] (bad_page+0xc8/0x128) [] (bad_page) from [] (free_pages_prepare+0x168/0x1e0) [] (free_pages_prepare) from [] (free_hot_cold_page+0x3c/0x174) [] (free_hot_cold_page) from [] (__free_pages+0x54/0x58) [] (__free_pages) from [] (free_highmem_page+0x38/0x88) [] (free_highmem_page) from [] (mem_init+0x240/0x430) [] (mem_init) from [] (start_kernel+0x1e4/0x3c8) [] (start_kernel) from [<80208074>] (0x80208074) Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint Removing the lower 2MB made the start of the lowmem zone to no longer be page block aligned. IFC6410 uses CONFIG_FLATMEM where alloc_node_mem_map allocates memory for the mem_map. alloc_node_mem_map will offset for unaligned nodes with the assumption the pfn/page translation functions will account for the offset. The functions for CONFIG_FLATMEM do not offset however, resulting in overrunning the memmap array. Just use the allocated memmap without any offset when running with CONFIG_FLATMEM to avoid the overrun. Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott Reported-by: Srinivas Kandagatla --- The thread got too deep so I split this out into a new thread. See http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=142188852025672&w=2 for previous thread discussion, last comment by Vlastimil http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=142505070430844&w=2 --- mm/page_alloc.c | 15 ++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index a47f0b2..a308ec7 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -4945,6 +4945,8 @@ static void __paginginit free_area_init_core(struct pglist_data *pgdat, static void __init_refok alloc_node_mem_map(struct pglist_data *pgdat) { + unsigned long __maybe_unused offset = 0; + /* Skip empty nodes */ if (!pgdat->node_spanned_pages) return; @@ -4961,6 +4963,7 @@ static void __init_refok alloc_node_mem_map(struct pglist_data *pgdat) * for the buddy allocator to function correctly. */ start = pgdat->node_start_pfn & ~(MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES - 1); + offset = pgdat->node_start_pfn - start; end = pgdat_end_pfn(pgdat); end = ALIGN(end, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES); size = (end - start) * sizeof(struct page); @@ -4968,7 +4971,7 @@ static void __init_refok alloc_node_mem_map(struct pglist_data *pgdat) if (!map) map = memblock_virt_alloc_node_nopanic(size, pgdat->node_id); - pgdat->node_mem_map = map + (pgdat->node_start_pfn - start); + pgdat->node_mem_map = map + offset; } #ifndef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES /* @@ -4976,10 +4979,12 @@ static void __init_refok alloc_node_mem_map(struct pglist_data *pgdat) */ if (pgdat == NODE_DATA(0)) { mem_map = NODE_DATA(0)->node_mem_map; -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP - if (page_to_pfn(mem_map) != pgdat->node_start_pfn) - mem_map -= (pgdat->node_start_pfn - ARCH_PFN_OFFSET); -#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */ +#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP) || defined(CONFIG_FLATMEM) + if (page_to_pfn(mem_map) != pgdat->node_start_pfn) { + mem_map -= offset; + VM_BUG_ON(page_to_pfn(mem_map) != pgdat->node_start_pfn); + } +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP || CONFIG_FLATMEM */ } #endif #endif /* CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP */ -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project This e-mail address will be inactive after March 20, 2015 Please contact privately for follow up after that date.