linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] extcon: Fix missing locking when [un]registering notifiers
@ 2015-03-21 16:26 Hans de Goede
  2015-03-23  3:00 ` Chanwoo Choi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2015-03-21 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Since extcon-class.c is using raw_notifiers it must protect the notifier
list itself when [un]registering notifiers to avoid the list changing while
extcon_update_state is walking the list (through raw_notifier_call_chain).

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
index 8319f25..b079c41 100644
--- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
+++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
@@ -444,6 +444,9 @@ int extcon_register_interest(struct extcon_specific_cable_nb *obj,
 			     const char *extcon_name, const char *cable_name,
 			     struct notifier_block *nb)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret;
+
 	if (!obj || !cable_name || !nb)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -461,8 +464,11 @@ int extcon_register_interest(struct extcon_specific_cable_nb *obj,
 
 		obj->internal_nb.notifier_call = _call_per_cable;
 
-		return raw_notifier_chain_register(&obj->edev->nh,
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&obj->edev->lock, flags);
+		ret = raw_notifier_chain_register(&obj->edev->nh,
 						  &obj->internal_nb);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&obj->edev->lock, flags);
+		return ret;
 	} else {
 		struct class_dev_iter iter;
 		struct extcon_dev *extd;
@@ -495,10 +501,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_register_interest);
  */
 int extcon_unregister_interest(struct extcon_specific_cable_nb *obj)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret;
+
 	if (!obj)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	return raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&obj->edev->nh, &obj->internal_nb);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&obj->edev->lock, flags);
+	ret = raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&obj->edev->nh, &obj->internal_nb);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&obj->edev->lock, flags);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_unregister_interest);
 
@@ -515,7 +528,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_unregister_interest);
 int extcon_register_notifier(struct extcon_dev *edev,
 			struct notifier_block *nb)
 {
-	return raw_notifier_chain_register(&edev->nh, nb);
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
+	ret = raw_notifier_chain_register(&edev->nh, nb);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&edev->lock, flags);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_register_notifier);
 
@@ -527,7 +547,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_register_notifier);
 int extcon_unregister_notifier(struct extcon_dev *edev,
 			struct notifier_block *nb)
 {
-	return raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&edev->nh, nb);
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
+	ret = raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&edev->nh, nb);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&edev->lock, flags);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_unregister_notifier);
 
-- 
2.3.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] extcon: Fix missing locking when [un]registering notifiers
  2015-03-21 16:26 [PATCH] extcon: Fix missing locking when [un]registering notifiers Hans de Goede
@ 2015-03-23  3:00 ` Chanwoo Choi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chanwoo Choi @ 2015-03-23  3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hi Hans,

Looks good to me of this patch.

But,
I have some comment. You have to send extcon patch to linux-kernel at vger.kerne.org mailing list
but you missed it. Also if you fixes extcon driver, you should develop them on extcon git repository
because extcon-class.c was renamed to extcon.c. I added the extcon git repository and branch name.
- git repo : http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/extcon.git/
- branch : extcon-next

After I modified this patch without apply conflict personally,
I applied it on extcon-next branch.

Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi

On 03/22/2015 01:26 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Since extcon-class.c is using raw_notifiers it must protect the notifier
> list itself when [un]registering notifiers to avoid the list changing while
> extcon_update_state is walking the list (through raw_notifier_call_chain).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
> index 8319f25..b079c41 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
> @@ -444,6 +444,9 @@ int extcon_register_interest(struct extcon_specific_cable_nb *obj,
>  			     const char *extcon_name, const char *cable_name,
>  			     struct notifier_block *nb)
>  {
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	int ret;
> +
>  	if (!obj || !cable_name || !nb)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -461,8 +464,11 @@ int extcon_register_interest(struct extcon_specific_cable_nb *obj,
>  
>  		obj->internal_nb.notifier_call = _call_per_cable;
>  
> -		return raw_notifier_chain_register(&obj->edev->nh,
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&obj->edev->lock, flags);
> +		ret = raw_notifier_chain_register(&obj->edev->nh,
>  						  &obj->internal_nb);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&obj->edev->lock, flags);
> +		return ret;
>  	} else {
>  		struct class_dev_iter iter;
>  		struct extcon_dev *extd;
> @@ -495,10 +501,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_register_interest);
>   */
>  int extcon_unregister_interest(struct extcon_specific_cable_nb *obj)
>  {
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	int ret;
> +
>  	if (!obj)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	return raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&obj->edev->nh, &obj->internal_nb);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&obj->edev->lock, flags);
> +	ret = raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&obj->edev->nh, &obj->internal_nb);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&obj->edev->lock, flags);
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_unregister_interest);
>  
> @@ -515,7 +528,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_unregister_interest);
>  int extcon_register_notifier(struct extcon_dev *edev,
>  			struct notifier_block *nb)
>  {
> -	return raw_notifier_chain_register(&edev->nh, nb);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
> +	ret = raw_notifier_chain_register(&edev->nh, nb);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&edev->lock, flags);
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_register_notifier);
>  
> @@ -527,7 +547,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_register_notifier);
>  int extcon_unregister_notifier(struct extcon_dev *edev,
>  			struct notifier_block *nb)
>  {
> -	return raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&edev->nh, nb);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
> +	ret = raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&edev->nh, nb);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&edev->lock, flags);
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_unregister_notifier);
>  
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-23  3:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-21 16:26 [PATCH] extcon: Fix missing locking when [un]registering notifiers Hans de Goede
2015-03-23  3:00 ` Chanwoo Choi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).